Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,347 posts)
Sat Sep 24, 2016, 01:45 PM Sep 2016

North Carolina Will Restrict Body Camera Videos Beginning October 1


North Carolina Will Restrict Body Camera Videos Beginning October 1


A North Carolina law that limits public access to footage from police body cameras goes into effect on October 1st. North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory signed the bill in mid-July, however, the issue has become increasingly relevant in the wake of the shooting death of Keith L. Scott and subsequent protests in Charlotte, North Carolina over this past week.
The new law, which the ACLU referred to as “shameful,” states that footage from the body camera videos are not public record. If someone is seen or heard on the video, they may submit a written request to see it, but they cannot be released to the public without a court order.

Governor McCrory defended the law as a way to give the public information about controversial interactions with law enforcement without creating a so-called distorted picture that would be “extremely unfair to our law enforcement officials.”

Opponents of the law say it is yet another obstacle to ensuring people of color have their civil liberties respected. “There is no reason this footage should not be public record,” said North Carolina state representative Verla Insko. “It involves public employees carrying out public duties, using publicly funded equipment, while being paid by the public. This information is the very definition of a public record.”

Protests have sprung up in Charlotte in the wake of the recent killing of Keith L. Scott, who community members say was clutching nothing but a book at the time of his shooting death by police. There have been calls for the Department of Justice to intervene in both the shooting investigation and the state’s body camera law.

http://feminist.org/blog/index.php/2016/09/22/north-carolina-will-restrict-body-camera-videos-beginning-october-1/
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
North Carolina Will Restrict Body Camera Videos Beginning October 1 (Original Post) niyad Sep 2016 OP
And people wonder why? ghostsinthemachine Sep 2016 #1
I put McCrory in the same basket as Trump, but I don't have a real problem denying access to Hoyt Sep 2016 #2
Catch-22 Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2016 #3
and that is the whole point. niyad Sep 2016 #4
Rec for exposure awoke_in_2003 Sep 2016 #5
At first glance, I didn't have a problem with it. toddwv Sep 2016 #6
and since we all have seen good reason not to trust the police. . . . niyad Sep 2016 #7
It's not likely it will be seen as anything but a gimmee to the police state. toddwv Sep 2016 #8
Meanwhile a different police department publicly post photos of people high Glassunion Sep 2016 #9
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
2. I put McCrory in the same basket as Trump, but I don't have a real problem denying access to
Sat Sep 24, 2016, 01:51 PM
Sep 2016

videos to anyone who wants to view it. As long as victims, their families, their attorney, investigators, civil or criminal juries, etc., have access, that's OK.

Most police engagements with the public should remain private to the general public.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,007 posts)
3. Catch-22
Sat Sep 24, 2016, 02:00 PM
Sep 2016
If someone is seen or heard on the video, they may submit a written request to see it, but they cannot be released to the public without a court order.


You can't know that without seeing and hearing the video.

Catch-22.

toddwv

(2,830 posts)
6. At first glance, I didn't have a problem with it.
Sat Sep 24, 2016, 02:49 PM
Sep 2016

The law allows for the disclosure of video if an individual in the video or their representative requests it. Which would protect individuals from having their activities exposed.

However, if you read deeper: the bill is exactly what everyone feels it is. It gives a heavy deference to what or if footage will be released.

http://imgur.com/a/UoG2c

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
9. Meanwhile a different police department publicly post photos of people high
Sat Sep 24, 2016, 03:14 PM
Sep 2016

On heroine, with their child in the back seat. In an effort to shame them. Because we all know that's how you fix addiction.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»North Carolina Will Restr...