Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 12:43 PM Sep 2016

Polls Tightening....Frightening.

Hillary’s substantial lead has diminished, it seems over the past week’
Nate Silver’s Poll had her in the low 60s% is today down to to close to 52 while Trump is at 48.

Why? who the hell Knows.. My gut tells me it was the the N.Y. Bombing...Frightening events like the Chelsea Bombing frighten so many people into looking for a Great Protecter. They don’t care about his lies, his history, or anything else which should disqualify him from running for President.

They just care about protecting themselves from foreign Terrorists... Doesn’t matter if the terror is perpetrated by Naturalized Citizens.. If there is a foreign SOUNDING Muslim Name attached to the violence,.......thats all they need to hear and then cower towards Trump.

By the way Nate Silver’s 538 called 50 out of 50 states ion 2012..

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

skylucy

(3,740 posts)
1. I don't buy it. I don't think the polls have tightened when pollsters use the same
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 12:47 PM
Sep 2016

criteria etc. I also think Hillary's ground game and GOTV will prevail big time.

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)
2. A good look and read by Sam Wang - Princeton
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 12:47 PM
Sep 2016

As of September 26, 11:34AM EDT:
Snapshot (149 state polls): Clinton 292, Trump 246 EV    Meta-margin: Clinton +1.5%
RSS Clinton Nov. win probability: random drift 69%, Bayesian 79%


Senate snapshot (47 polls): Dem+Ind: 49, GOP: 51, Meta-margin: R +0.7%, Nov. control probability: Dem. 55%

http://election.princeton.edu/faq/

Read down the left column, too...Wang's explanation of how other pollsters operate...good read..be well..

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
4. Almost everyone in the business could call 50/50 in 2012
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 12:52 PM
Sep 2016

Even simple models like TPM's polltracker could get close to that.

Easy elections are easy to call.

LeftInTX

(25,504 posts)
5. I think Clinton can turn the Chelsea bombing into a positive
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 12:54 PM
Sep 2016

She can explain how quickly intelligence sources were able to identify the subject etc.

Also, she can emphasize that the suspect was born in the US.

She also needs to say that that bomber is a terrorist because that is what voters want to hear. (I heard this from my husband)

Atman

(31,464 posts)
6. Eff the polls. Watch the betting parlors.
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 12:55 PM
Sep 2016

Bookies have Hillary taking it easily. Not really even close. They have money involved, so they're more thorough. The networks and big polling organizations have money involved, too, but in all the wrong ways -- advertising dollars. It is good business to have the race extremely close. You'd never tune into a football game that you knew would be a total hopeless blowout.

maryellen99

(3,789 posts)
7. With the way things are going
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 12:58 PM
Sep 2016

I wouldn't be surprised if Nate Silver has Trump leading in California and New York soon.

Starbuck2239

(29 posts)
8. Time to pivot to more positive ads?
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 01:00 PM
Sep 2016

Yes, some polls' directions are scary.

Yes, keep hammering Drumpf for being racist, unstable, and a liar.

But doesn't it seem time for Clinton to run as many positive ads about her as negative about Drumpf?

She could start with her first year agenda of policy proposals, in the article below, which media has mostly ignored. And yes, I know it's been posted here at DU before.

In the middle of the article is a chart of bullet points on her policies. For those who say Clinton is "too detailed" this is a good list of brief(er) points.


http://highline.huffingtonpost.com/articles/en/hillary-clinton-policy-agenda/

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
11. Also, secretary Clinton needs to be out there everyday giving at least two town
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 01:20 PM
Sep 2016

Halls a day. No more days off...she has taken off more then just sickness. Trump hasn't taken a day off at all.

Response to busterbrown (Original post)

Foggyhill

(1,060 posts)
14. Nate Silver is a hack and oversells himself. I'm tired of him.
Mon Sep 26, 2016, 01:41 PM
Sep 2016

He misuses stats and collates polls that each are garbage individually.
And yes, got a lot of experience in stats (engineering, mgt and comm degrees) and some experience on polls in Canada.
Good polling is hard and most of those snap polls are simply B.A.D.

Seemingly, not one of these polls is interested in determining truth,
they're more interested in selling themselves (so, just like the media).

With the few good polls being flooded out by 20 bad polls, there is no incentive anymore to create good ones.

A part of this is that it is increasingly hard and expensive to get a representative sample of the voting population (with landlines disapeering and response rates plummeting) and less incentive to do so (since the media report all of them as cash regardless).

The underpolling of the under 35 and minorities compounded by basically expecting them not to vote, means
a good GOTV could easily make a 5 points difference with what Clinton is getting.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Polls Tightening....Frigh...