General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo I am curious DU. Can we now agree that the word "pussy" is misogynist?
In the derogatory context toward a female genitalia and women.
12 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes | |
9 (75%) |
|
No | |
3 (25%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Doodley
(9,092 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)If so, yes.
Stinky The Clown
(67,806 posts)Attack the use of the word, not the word itself.
By the way, I get your point and agree.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Consider that a word ban?
emulatorloo
(44,130 posts)Serious question I am trying to figure all this out?
boston bean
(36,221 posts)emulatorloo
(44,130 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Just given their elasticity they are way tougher than balls, which have an overly false "tough" persona.
Texasgal
(17,045 posts)He's a pig and anyone that uses that type of vile language to describe a Woman is no better.
tandem5
(2,072 posts)help but view the use as misogynistic, but that's just a truism.
jodymarie aimee
(3,975 posts)you can use vulgar words for males, not females. I reported Ann Coulter at Rob Lowe roast and you'd have though I stuck an ice pick in DU's eyes. All I did was REPORT what she was called. Major freakout. As a long time feminist(65 years) I call us people. I ignore the sex. I call it wisdom !!
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)The word in its entirety or the word in context? Any word could be misogynist if used to refer to a person as something else. It depends. In the context Trump used it, "Grab them by the..." it's not really misogynist. It's gross, but not misogynist.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)CRF450
(2,244 posts)Since when is this offensive?
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)But not misogynist.