Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 12:50 PM Oct 2016

A 90-Year-Old Woman Who’s Voted Since 1948 Was Disenfranchised by Wisconsin’s Voter-ID Law

Christine Krucki was born in Lublin, Wisconsin, in 1925. She first voted in the 1948 presidential election and has voted ever since. She’s an independent who has voted for John F. Kennedy but also Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. But after Wisconsin passed its strict voter-ID law in 2011, Krucki lost her right to vote. She made three trips to the DMV, bringing an Illinois photo ID, proof of residence in Wisconsin, a birth certificate and her marriage certificate but could not get a Wisconsin photo ID for voting.

https://www.thenation.com/article/a-90-year-old-woman-whos-voted-since-1948-was-disenfranchised-by-wisconsins-voter-id-law/

Story is a couple of days old but very much worth reading.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MiniMe

(21,716 posts)
1. It's worth reading, but she changed her name often, and didn't go through the courts to do it
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 01:11 PM
Oct 2016

I'm not defending the voter ID law here, but I will defend the workers because of the name changes. It seems there were a slew of clerical errors, starting with her original birth certificate.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
2. An Illinois photo ID and proof of residence in Wisconsin ought to be enough to vote
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 01:30 PM
Oct 2016

Don't you think so?

MiniMe

(21,716 posts)
3. From reading the article, the problem is more about all the name changes
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 02:54 PM
Oct 2016

I think they should take into account her voting record, not who she voted for, but just that she has voted since 1948. It started with her birth certificate, then she went by another name for a while before she got married. And it was that other name that was on her marriage certificate. So to try to trace her back to her birth certificate is almost impossible.

I am in no way saying this is right, just that I can understand why she is having a problem. She wasn't born in a hospital (not that there is anything wrong with that) and they misspelled the last name on the birth certificate

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
4. The name change was only a problem when she needed to get the additional documents
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 05:08 PM
Oct 2016

It seemed as though the documents she already had (IL ID and WIS proof of res) ought to have been enough.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
5. When Florida implemented their stricter photo ID laws, my mother had problems
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 05:43 PM
Oct 2016

She did not have a copy of her birth certificate and ordered one from Alabama. When the records were digitized some clerk entered the date her birth was recorded as the date of birth. That meant the birth certificate date did not match any of Mom's other records - her Social Security, Navy Nurse enlistment, her marriage license,her driver's license, nothing. It took a couple of years and a LOT of correspondence and sending other records for Alabama to correct their digital records even after she had found the original birth certificate that gave both the date of birth and the date it was recorded.

Meanwhile she missed voting for those years - a women who has voted in every election in her lifetime and who had worked at the polls every election for forty years was disenfranchised for those years.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A 90-Year-Old Woman Who’s...