The VP votes to break a tie in the Senate. The House? Pretty unlikely to go with a Dem majority in November (nice thought, but unlikely) because there are too many gerrymandered protected GOP seats. But between the House Democrats and the sane House Republicans (very few though), they might be able to stop any impeachment attempts.

Well before Barack Obama got the nomination, there was already a website named http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/. I wouldn't doubt there was one for Hillary Clinton registered at the same time.

Yep, there is a web address registered but the domain name is for sale:

Impeachment is a political process, not a legal process.

But we're talking about the GOP.

On what political grounds do we suspect that they'd impeach her?

Win, win, win.

Fuck everything they "might do."

WIN.

They won't be able to investigate jack shit without the House.

Assuming that the repubs hold the House, they probably will do so by a much small majority. Getting a majority to sign on to an impeachment investigation shortly after Clinton is inaugurated probably isn't going to have universal support among even the repubs.

Having said that, will someone introduce an impeachment resolution, possibly not long after Clinton's inauguration? Wouldn't be that surprising. After all, impeachment resolutions and even a hearing isn't that uncommon. Truman, Nixon, Reagan, Bush I, Bush II, and Obama have all been the subject of impeachment resolutions and/or hearings.

As for continuing to block a ninth justice -- that's not likely either. If Clinton sticks with Garland, he'll sail through. He might even get confirmed before she takes office.

And if she gets an opportunity to name a new justice, there will be the usual fighting over it, but if she chooses wisely, she can put the repubs in a very tough spot if they block a qualified justice.

Finally, will there continue to be a lot of stalemate on other things? Almost certainly.

Impeachable offense. Only in his dreams, because he will never get even close.