General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCans and Can'ts of Teaching Evolution
Legal decisions concerning creationism and evolution rely upon the First Amendment of the US Constitution. In part, it states, "Congress shall make no laws regarding the establishment of religion, or inhibiting the free exercise thereof." The Establishment and Free Exercise clauses taken together require that public institutions be religiously-neutral: schools can neither promote nor inhibit religious expression.
So it is perfectly legal for a teacher to teach about religion, although it has to be in a nondevotional context. One can describe a religion, or religious views, but it is not constitutional to say, "Buddha was right!" Similarly, one can discuss controversies involving religion, but it would not be proper to take sides (such as "the Pilgrims were right to burn witches because witches are evil." Let's look at what a teacher can't do.
A state/district/school CAN'T ban the teaching of evolution.
https://ncse.com/library-resource/cans-cants-teaching-evolution
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Evolution is a fucking fact. Trying to put it on the same level as unsubstantiated nonsense is deliberately crippling the next generation, intellectually.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)As an educator, I can tell you that the pressure brought to bear on the district and principals, and then passed down to teachers, by the parents and communities with an evangelical fire hotter than their mythical hell DOES result in schools backing down and placating...over and over.
I can say that I know science teachers who reassure parents and their students that evolution is "just a theory." In the realm of science, a theory is an idea that is so strongly supported by data and prediction that it might as well be called a fact. But in common conversation among non-scientists, theory means almost the opposite. To the non-scientist, calling something a theory means you dont have enough data to confirm it. This contradiction opens the door to repeated rejection of the science, and is often not clarified by science teachers under pressure from battle-weary principals and districts to cover their asses.
In my own classes, our state standards require that the history of Judaism and "the rise of Islam" be taught. Parents don't mind me teaching the history of Judaism as presented in adopted text books, although they do expect it to align with the old testament. When it comes to the "rise of Islam?" They rise up in a typhoon of outrage, sending wave after wave after wave of attacks at me, the principal, and the school district, despite our ability to point out the actual content standards required by the state.
Of course, the further down the corporate deform path we've gone with high stakes testing, the more the pressure to teach no Social Studies at all, since it's not tested. So, when I'm furtively trying to sneak in some history and government under the cover of "reading instruction," while wildly hoping one of those random, unscheduled walk in observations doesn't happen that day, we can't get to very much anyway.