Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,370 posts)
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 11:53 AM Oct 2016

American Indians killed by cops at highest rate in the nation, but they're invisible in the media

http://m.dailykos.com/story/2016/10/21/1585414/-American-Indians-killed-by-cops-at-highest-rate-in-the-nation-but-they-re-invisible-in-the-media


I know it was unprofessional of me. But I wept when I read Stephanie Woodard’s investigative piece on the killings of American Indians by cops published Monday in the democratic socialist magazine In These Times. It’s no stretch to say it broke my heart.

The reasons for those tears, which continue to spring forth days after my first reading, are many.

Even though none were of my tribe, they were still my people, like me, descendants of the first humans to set foot on this continent 400 generations ago. Like the slayings of so many African Americans killed by police, the deaths of many of them could have easily been avoided by smarter, more compassionate and less trigger-happy cops. And, as is so often the case in matters relating to living indigenous Americans, these dead men and women were invisible. Most didn’t show up in the media or the statistics. Woodard’s story should have been on the front page of The New York Times, the centerpiece of a report on NBC, the subject of speeches on the Senate floor.

The good news is that these killings have now been exposed. And, equally important, inspired by Black Lives Matter, some Indian activists, including Chase Iron Eyes, the Lakota lawyer of the Standing Rock Sioux who is running as a Democrat for North Dakota’s single congressional seat, have for the past two years organized Native Lives Matter to bring attention to this situation and hold police and prosecutors accountable.

..more..
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
American Indians killed by cops at highest rate in the nation, but they're invisible in the media (Original Post) G_j Oct 2016 OP
While the article is an important article for exposure, why is the article making still_one Oct 2016 #1
Some indigenous people prefer American Indian over native american tymorial Oct 2016 #2
appreciate the insight still_one Oct 2016 #7
Out in this part of the west... 2naSalit Oct 2016 #4
Thanks still_one Oct 2016 #6
Diversity of usage. Igel Oct 2016 #5
K&R ismnotwasm Oct 2016 #3
K&R for Exposure Retired George Oct 2016 #8
All kinds of humorous threads get kicked and recommended. List left Oct 2016 #9
So sad.... LeftInTX Oct 2016 #10
K & R malaise Oct 2016 #11

still_one

(92,395 posts)
1. While the article is an important article for exposure, why is the article making
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 12:12 PM
Oct 2016

references as "Indians", and not Native Americans?

tymorial

(3,433 posts)
2. Some indigenous people prefer American Indian over native american
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 12:36 PM
Oct 2016

The use and identification is a complex issue and it varies from individual to individual and tribe to tribe. While it is by no means universal, the further west you go the more likely you will find that American Indian is preferred but again it is really up to the individual. I would need to check my sources but I believe the term Native American was coined by the news print media as a means to be sensitive. Some feel as though they weren't asked if it was appropriate and welcomed.

2naSalit

(86,775 posts)
4. Out in this part of the west...
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 01:03 PM
Oct 2016

All the "Native Americans"/"American Indians" I know call themselves Indians, or go by the name of the their tribe, ie, Nez Perce, Shoshoni, etc..

Igel

(35,356 posts)
5. Diversity of usage.
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 01:51 PM
Oct 2016

When I was in California I was told over and over I could only use the phrase "Native American."


As soon as the Indian Gaming Initiative qualified for the ballot, this was called into question. Why? Because the print, radio, and tv ads all showed Indians calling themselves Indians. The spokesfolk for the tribes referred to them and themselves as Indians. They needed votes, and talking down to people wasn't the way to get it. Moreover, they didn't have a problem referring to themselves or other tribes that way. It was when outsiders used the expression that they got bent out of shape, not because the expression itself had all that much baggage with it.


For many, dictating and controlling how people speak is just asking for courtesy, and if it's not met they're only mildly annoyed; for others, it's really dictating and controlling, and a lot of people like controlling others. If you can order somebody to speak a certain way, you most certain have power over them; and if they fail to follow your commands, then you get to shame them and try to humiliate them. Many on the left are into power trips, and they take what they can get no less their fellow-aspirers on the right. You can usually tell them by their hypocrisy; for many, it's a virtue.

List left

(595 posts)
9. All kinds of humorous threads get kicked and recommended.
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 02:58 PM
Oct 2016

All kinds of humorous threads get kicked and recommended. I don't understand why threads like this so easily languish.
Chasing cheap thrills I guess.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»American Indians killed b...