Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 08:48 PM Jun 2012

The 7 Major Issues Mitt Romney Won’t Take A Position On

The 7 Major Issues Mitt Romney Won’t Take A Position On

By Josh Israel

In March, Mitt Romney demanded “President Obama needs to level with the American public about his real agenda.” But on numerous topics, Romney has refused to answer basic questions about his views, leaving voters to guess at where he stands on important issues. Romney’s ambiguity appears to be a calculated strategy to avoid alienating the conservative base or moderate swing voters. If he’s successful in avoiding articulating policy positions, he can market himself as the “generic Republican” alternative to President Obama.

Here are seven major issues on which Romney has refused to take a stand:

1. Romney won’t say whether he would undo Obama’s decision to end deportations of DREAM-eligible immigrants. Romney and his campaign passed up numerous opportunities over the weekend to say whether he agreed with the substance of the Obama administration’s order to stop deporting some young undocumented immigrants and whether a President Romney would rescind the order, saying only, “We’ll look at that — we’ll look at that setting as we– as we reach that.”

2. Romney won’t say whether he’d support the Paycheck Fairness Act. Romney repeatedly dodged questions about whether he’d support the Paycheck Fairness Act, a bill to crack down on wage discrimination and close the wage gap between men and women. His campaign didn’t respond to five requests by the conservative Washington Times seeking his stance on the bill.

3. Romney won’t specify which tax loopholes he’d close. Asked yesterday which tax deductions he would eliminate to offset his massive proposed tax-cuts for the rich, Romney refused to offer any specifics on a plan that he has admitted is so vague it cannot even be scored, saying only, “We’ll go through that process with Congress.”

4. Romney won’t say which federal agencies he’d eliminate. <...>

5. Romney won’t say whether he supports the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. <...>

6. Romney won’t say whether he’d support full reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act. <...>

7. Romney won’t say whether say whether he’d eliminate the “carried interest” tax break for private equity partners. <...>

Whether or not Romney can continue to campaign while avoiding taking a position on so many important issues depends on the how the media reacts. There are dozens of reporters following Romney every day. They can choose to either give him a pass on these important policy issues or continue asking him until he provides an answer.

http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/06/18/501218/the-7-major-issues-mitt-romney-wont-take-a-position-on/


18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
2. How do you debate someone who has no positions, though?
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 08:55 PM
Jun 2012

Maybe that's Rmoney's strategy; he figures if he has nothing to say, Obama won't have anything to take him down with.

zbdent

(35,392 posts)
3. but if it were a Dem with Rmoney's (lack of) positions ...
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 09:05 PM
Jun 2012

the rapid-fire machine-gunning of the debate would be "where does he stand? We don't know anything about his position!"

After all the background checks on Obama's kindergarten drawings and the "subliminal messages" he put in them (which apparently showed his KENYAN MUSLIM agenda), the Repugs had the nerve to say "We don't know anything about him ..."

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
6. You present a lose-lose situation for your opponent and let him choose.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 09:56 PM
Jun 2012

Just off the top of my head....


"Gov. Romney, If President Bush's policies didn't cause the economic collapse and my (President Obama) economic policies didn't cause the recovery then why should anyone vote for a candidate based on his/her economic policies? It seems that you think they don't make any difference anyways."


Or...

"If President Bush's policies did cause the collapse and my policies did cause the recovery then shouldn't everyone vote for more recovery instead of voting for another collapse?"




Rmoney is trying to set up a win-win by not taking a stand. There is a flip side to that coin.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
7. What's he going to say in a debate if asked one of those questions?
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 09:57 PM
Jun 2012

If he refuses to answer he will look like a dick. And Obama will be able to say snidely something like "I guess my opponent hasn't put that issue through his etch-a-sketch yet".

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
8. He will do exactly what he's been doing the whole time
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 11:03 PM
Jun 2012

And it will be exactly what Bush did when debating Kerry.

He will answer a different question that only exists in hish ead.

And the media will eat it up.

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
9. He has taken a stand on a couple of things now, so give him credit for that!
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 11:18 PM
Jun 2012

Snort He wants to eliminate all income tax deductions and cut the federal and state work forces in the middle of a damn depression.

 

cbrer

(1,831 posts)
12. These are domestic issues
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 05:34 AM
Jun 2012

And well worth noting in terms of his maneuvering, posturing, and dodging.

I am afraid of the direction this country will take with Romney as CIC. Our country's imperialistic policies, invasions, and excursions are already leading us further in a direction away from enlightenment and peace. His leadership, along with the existing industrial complex, could spark a global conflagration that would cost our next few generations much more than a pile of bad debt.

And if he nominates Condi as VPOTUS?

I shudder...

luv_mykatz

(441 posts)
13. It isn't hard to figure out where Rmoney stands, even if he is dishonest and won't say so.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 03:33 PM
Jun 2012

Rmoney is obviously anti-women's rights, anti-immigrants, anti-environment, anti-workers rights, anti-working families, pro-plutocracy, pro-plundering,etc., ad nauseum.

How anyone could doubt this is beyond my comprehension.

ANY candidate that has the Rethuglican brand stands for all of the above, and more.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
18. True, and
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 10:34 AM
Jun 2012

"Biggest one is missing. How's he going to create millions of jobs."

...how on earth will he achieve job creation given his fascination with "WaWas" (http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002825141)?

This should be used in an ad:

Then I was at a Wawa's. I went to order a sandwich. You press the little touch-tone keypad, all right? You just touch that, and, you know, that sandwich comes, you just touch this, touch this, touch this, go pay the cashier, there's your sandwich. It's amazing! People in the private sector have learned how to compete! It's time to bring some competition to the federal government and get it smaller, and respond to the customers, which are you!


http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002827998

Romney's job-creation proposal: Get smaller, replace people with " the little touch-tone keypad."







Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The 7 Major Issues Mitt R...