General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEmail Observation
I am a frequent reader of Latest Threads, but almost never start a thread or comment on one. But I've been wondering if anyone else has this observation. All campaign season Hillary has had to apologize and explain her email use. She's gotten beaten up badly while her surrogates never gave her a robust full-throated defense. They would say she made a mistake and regrets it, wouldn't do it again, etc. Then after Comey clears her, they say ok let's turn the page. If she or they try to point out the hypocracy of it all, of how she is being judged by a new standard, they would get drowned out. With Comey's blatant act the Dems are hitting back hard like I've never seen before. She is, too. IMO his act has prompted an angry backflash. It has ripped the scab off and exposed this for what it and what it has been all along. Provided that she doesn't take a major hit in the polls over the final days of the campaign, Comey's heavy-handed partisan act might have the effect of poisioning the well for the GOP in the minds of the Repubs and Dems (as evidenced by Deputy Attorney Generals from both parties denoucing it and Fox legal experts as well) who seem truly horrified by what he did. Was this the bridge too far? I'm sorry it took this to wake up Dems to passionately come to Hillary's defense, but I am glad they have. Any thoughts?
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)My thought.
See you at the polls for Hillary Nov. 8.
vadermike
(1,416 posts)and am just now catching up that Fox of all places is slamming Comey.. good news... i am just still worried about what the final effect is on the state based polling going into next week.. i think it motivates more of our base to show up... which is Huge!
Farmgirl1961
(1,494 posts)However, the longer it stays as a "news" story (blah...blah...blah "Hillary's emails" blah...blah...blah) the more of a distraction it is.
Skittles
(153,193 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)You joined DU at 8:30 pm on Election Day 2012?
That's crazy.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Aside from that, for those of us who value transparency, it was indefensible. It is forgivable but one cannot defend it and say they value transparency. I think they have been doing the best they can with it and we are better off acknowledging a huge ethical lapse and moving on.
OnDoutside
(19,969 posts)right thing by hitting back hard.
world wide wally
(21,754 posts)Harder!
Harder!
(Too much football today?)
canetoad
(17,183 posts)Too blatant, too big, too late. Too much fucking everything, except fair and possibly legal.