Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGood news: The EPA isn’t watching you with drones
Good news: The EPA isnt watching you with drones
By Philip Bump
Did you hear that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is using drones to spy on farmers to track their movements and probably take away their Second Amendment rights and force them to use solar power and eat soy?
If you heard that, turn off Fox News. And maybe wean yourself off of Twitter.
A long time ago, the EPA discovered that it was much more cost-effective to monitor violations to the Clean Water Act by using small planes to fly over farms. As the Washington Post notes, the Supreme Court signed off on the practice in 1986, and its only a very small part of how the EPA does enforcement.
In May, a group of U.S. senators sent a letter to the EPA asking about flyovers in Nebraska. A Twitter user with a fondness for eagles read aerial surveillance in the letter and tweeted security drones. A conservative blog picked that up and, next thing you know, its on Fox News. Fox, perhaps busy with other things, failed to call the EPA to ask whether the rumor was true.
- more -
http://grist.org/news/good-news-the-epa-isnt-watching-you-with-drones/
By Philip Bump
Did you hear that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is using drones to spy on farmers to track their movements and probably take away their Second Amendment rights and force them to use solar power and eat soy?
If you heard that, turn off Fox News. And maybe wean yourself off of Twitter.
A long time ago, the EPA discovered that it was much more cost-effective to monitor violations to the Clean Water Act by using small planes to fly over farms. As the Washington Post notes, the Supreme Court signed off on the practice in 1986, and its only a very small part of how the EPA does enforcement.
In May, a group of U.S. senators sent a letter to the EPA asking about flyovers in Nebraska. A Twitter user with a fondness for eagles read aerial surveillance in the letter and tweeted security drones. A conservative blog picked that up and, next thing you know, its on Fox News. Fox, perhaps busy with other things, failed to call the EPA to ask whether the rumor was true.
- more -
http://grist.org/news/good-news-the-epa-isnt-watching-you-with-drones/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1102 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good news: The EPA isn’t watching you with drones (Original Post)
ProSense
Jun 2012
OP
The one gov't agency that actually could use drones to do their job & protect the American people...
limpyhobbler
Jun 2012
#3
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)1. Hah!
I'm not usually a big fan of Grist, but that second paragraph is fucking perfect. Not to mention, it applies far too much to some DUers.
Beartracks
(12,814 posts)2. Fox's mantra: "If we want it to be true, it IS!" n/t
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)3. The one gov't agency that actually could use drones to do their job & protect the American people...
And they aren't.
IADEMO2004
(5,554 posts)4. 2 links. Orginal story and Letter to EPA story