General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDan Rather speaks truth to injustice
Last edited Wed Nov 23, 2016, 08:49 AM - Edit history (1)
Please follow link, this is what news used to be like. Well worth the read!The journalist whose show, Dan Rathers America is on Sirius XM, says the problem goes beyond party or policy and reaches down to the fundamentals of our democracy:
"History will demand to know which side were you on. This is not a question of politics or party or even policy. This is a question about the very fundamentals of our beautiful experiment in a pluralistic democracy ruled by law."
"When I see neo-Nazis raise their hands in terrifying solute, in public, in our nations capital, I shudder in horror. When I see that action mildly rebuked by a boilerplate statement from the President-elect whom these bigots have praised, the anger in me grows. And when I see some in a pliant press turn that mild statement into what they call a denunciation I cannot hold back any longer."
"We set up institutions like a free press and an independent court system to protect our fragile rights. We have survived through bloody spasms of a Civil War and a Civil Rights Movement to extend more of these rights to more of our citizens. But the direction of our ship of state has not always been one of progress."
"We are a great nation. We have survived deep challenges in our past. We can and will do so again. But we cannot be afraid to speak and act to ensure the future we want for our children and grandchildren."
http://www.bipartisanreport.com/2016/11/22/breaking-dan-rather-drops-big-donald-trump-announcement-details/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Normally, the losing side in the presidential election frets about the countrys future, and the press gives the winner some latitude. But Rather says that these are not normal times. The problem is not about tax policy, health care, or education even though all those and more are so important. Instead the problem is far deeper: racism, bigotry, intimidation and the specter of corruption.
Demit
(11,238 posts)If I have to follow the link to find out what it is, that makes your post seem like clickbait, sorry.
AmericanMan1958
(520 posts)That while posting in DU we should take care in the amount of the article that we post.
I happen to read many articles a day. I share what I find of interest and hope other do, also.
I pay to support DU and many other news sites financially.
Personally I do not feel obligate to research for you and post complete articles.
What I read and post is in hopes to inform and gain others feedback.
I find your comment to have little value.
If you have nothing positive to say you are welcome to ignore my post! Sorry!!!
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)C Moon
(12,213 posts)Demit
(11,238 posts)It now more accurately reflects the content of the story (which, yes, I did read).
A little advice: You say you want feedback. If you really mean that, you have to be willing to accept when comments aren't positive. This is a discussion forum.
AmericanMan1958
(520 posts)After further comments I seen that the originals website's title seemed to distract from the true intent of Dan Rather's message.
I felt a correction was in order and decided to make the change. The content of the article held much more importance than the mere title. So thus a change was in order.
Thank you for your constructive feedback and will give my titles more attention in the future.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Time to raise interest rates.
JI7
(89,252 posts)spanone
(135,844 posts)Liberty Belle
(9,535 posts)Thank you, Dan Rather for speaking the truth.
LuvLoogie
(7,011 posts)I can't take the emotional language throughout the news articles. I much prefer pro publica, or media matters even. You can have a liberal voice without sounding like a bad 70s movie send up of a communist newsletter.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)Its a good statement, but its not an announcement of something we didn't know.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)n/t.