General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"When the president does it, that means it's not illegal."
Maggie HabermanVerified account
?@maggieNYT
Trump on his businesses/conflict q's: "The law's totally on my side, the president can't have a conflict of interest."
vi5
(13,305 posts)Some of the folks on "our side" seemed to buy into that idea. Nothing even in the same universe as what Trump is going to do, but creeping incrementalism falls into our lap as much as anyone else.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)vi5
(13,305 posts)...again, it's not Trump level stuff but it's still things that I don't want him to have the power to do, but that for the past 8 years our side said "Oh, it's no big deal. We trust Obama.
Igel
(35,320 posts)Those are just the things that *have* been done that we don't like.
Add in those things like DACA that are questionable, and it's worse.
Then put into the mix all the things that many (D) have wanted Obama to do--rewrite the budget ex parte, rewrite immigration laws, compel states to do more than the law requires. ... You soon realize that the absence of civics in school (and for those states/schools with civics classes, the utter irrelevance that many view such courses with) has left a lot of people, (R), (L), and center, with a view that when their guy (or gal) is in power s/he's got a lot more power than is the case.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)anarch
(6,535 posts)When the authorities break the law, then there isn't any law--just a fight for survival.
Baitball Blogger
(46,736 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)removed by impeachment? Or have I forgotten my history? Seems to me that he paid a high price for his ugly ways.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)muttering to past president's portraits, eating dog biscuits when he treated his dogs, and was getting drunk on martinis all of the time.