General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsElectoral College must reject Trump unless he sells his business, top lawyers for Bush and Obama say
Judd LegumFollow
Editor-In-Chief, ThinkProgress
4 hrs ago
Ethics lawyers for the last two presidents are in agreement.
Members of the Electoral College should not make Donald Trump the next president unless he sells his companies and puts the proceeds in a blind trust, according to the top ethics lawyers for the last two presidents.
Richard Painter, Chief Ethics Counsel for George W. Bush, and Norman Eisen, Chief Ethics Counsel for Barack Obama, believe that if Trump continues to retain ownership over his sprawling business interests by the time the electors meet on December 19, they should reject Trump.
In an email to ThinkProgress, Eisen explained that the founders did not want any foreign payments to the president. Period. This principle is enshrined in Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution, which bars office holders from accepting any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
This provision was specifically created to prevent the President, most of all, from being corrupted by foreign influences. Virginia Governor Edmund Jennings Randolph addressed the issue directly during a Constitutional debate in June 1788, noting that a violation of the provision by the President would be grounds for impeachment. (Randolph was also a delegate to the Constitutional Convention.)
more
https://thinkprogress.org/electoral-college-trump-top-lawyers-8a8b6e0ca916#.iqocn4f0p
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)His conflicts of interest are an order of magnitude beyond anything we've ever seen before. Not to mention still no taxes. God knows what he's hiding.
wryter2000
(46,049 posts)I think the Republicans (minus the Tea Party bozos) will get rid of him for the sake of their party. Of course, that means President Pence. Gag.
DK504
(3,847 posts) ... the founders did not want any foreign payments to the president. Period. This principle is enshrined in Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution, which bars office holders from accepting any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.
So how the hell can he be called President since he has refused to do anything resembling what a president must do or achieve the office with out achieving it via illegal activities??
WTF?
Hekate
(90,692 posts)....by the EC. That way neither of them will defile the White House.
bucolic_frolic
(43,168 posts)Where Founders saw patriotic long-term visionaries - people like
themselves - we have installed political hacks beholden to their
factions, now known as parties. We're going to get these groups to
worry about ethics? The Constitution? Conflicts of interest? They ARE
their own conflict of interest.
ShakeWell
(28 posts)Oh wait... that's right, there hasn't been any since he hasn't had a presser since September and conflicts of interest that will inevitably be constitutionally challenged for impeachable offenses are not nearly as sexy as email.
Ford_Prefect
(7,901 posts)And the scale of his empire is so broad that it doesn't fit under a catchphrase.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)Ford_Prefect
(7,901 posts)BSdetect
(8,998 posts)The moron is capable of any crime.