General Discussion

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts) Tue Nov 29, 2016, 04:20 PM Nov 2016

I'm going to swallow my intrinsic disdain, and join Twitter for ...

the express purpose of tweeting the following to Trump whenever I feel the urge:

"Dear Donald, heartiest congratulations on your recent runner-up finish in the 2016 Presidential election."

Please feel free to join in. (You just know it's eating at him!)

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm going to swallow my intrinsic disdain, and join Twitter for ... (Original Post) 11 Bravo Nov 2016 OP

He won't see it. fleur-de-lisa Nov 2016 #1

If it catches on, he'll hear about it. 11 Bravo Nov 2016 #2

He'll block you after the first tweet. nt tblue37 Nov 2016 #3

An intrinsic disdain for a social media platform sounds rational. LanternWaste Nov 2016 #4

I appear to have acquired a designated noodge. 11 Bravo Nov 2016 #5

fleur-de-lisa

(14,628 posts)

1. He won't see it.

Reply to 11 Bravo (Original post)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 04:22 PM

Nov 2016

He only follows like 40-something people so he can stay safe in his echo chamber.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)

2. If it catches on, he'll hear about it.

Reply to fleur-de-lisa (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 04:26 PM

Nov 2016

I just want to remind him and his sycophants at every opportunity that he got smoked by a woman.

tblue37

(65,477 posts)

3. He'll block you after the first tweet. nt

Reply to 11 Bravo (Original post)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 04:33 PM

Nov 2016

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)

4. An intrinsic disdain for a social media platform sounds rational.

Reply to 11 Bravo (Original post)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 05:08 PM

Nov 2016

An intrinsic disdain for a social media platform sounds rational. I imagine someone's great-grandfather once, by nature, scorned the county message tree... and felt himself much more remarkable for doing so.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)

5. I appear to have acquired a designated noodge.

Reply to LanternWaste (Reply #4)

Tue Nov 29, 2016, 05:17 PM

Nov 2016

How very special.

Reply to this discussion