Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 05:07 PM Jun 2012

Leahy: Dispute Over Fast And Furious Docs Could Have Been Resolved

Leahy: Dispute Over Fast And Furious Docs Could Have Been Resolved

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), who chairs the Senate Judicary Committee, issued this statement on the House Oversight Committee’s vote to find Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt:

“This is a dispute between the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and the Justice Department. I do believe it could and should have been resolved. The Department has made extraordinary efforts to balance the sensitivities associated with ongoing criminal investigations and the need to be responsive to congressional oversight. The Bush Justice Department was not nearly this forthcoming and never tried to reach a reasonable accommodation in response to our oversight efforts.

“Because Attorney General Holder has testified about Fast and Furious on many occasions, we have learned what happened and what went wrong. The Attorney General stopped the use of inappropriate tactics that dated back to the Bush administration when he learned of them, and those responsible have been held accountable. It is time to put the focus back on helping with the Justice Department’s law enforcement efforts, including its work to stop the violence on the southern border at the hands of Mexican drug cartels.”
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/leahy-dispute-over-fast-furious-docs-could-have


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Leahy: Dispute Over Fast And Furious Docs Could Have Been Resolved (Original Post) ProSense Jun 2012 OP
After I heard Randi Rhodes explanation of the facts in the first hour of JDPriestly Jun 2012 #1
But that wouldn't score Goody Issa an Justice Department email talking trash about him. n/t Bolo Boffin Jun 2012 #2
K & R Scurrilous Jun 2012 #3

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
1. After I heard Randi Rhodes explanation of the facts in the first hour of
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 06:05 PM
Jun 2012

her show today (available maybe on her website), it occurred to me that some people in Arizona may be under investigation and that the Republicans and Issa are trying to help those people avoid prosecution or at least get the evidence against them before a grand jury is called.

I don't know. This may be another of my wild theories, but it is a possibility worth exploring.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Leahy: Dispute Over Fast ...