General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's Cabinet Is a Coup Waiting to Happen
Trumps Cabinet Is a Coup Waiting to Happen
The president-elects main advisors are a clique of warrior-generals who may spell the end of the democratic experiment.
By William J. Astore
Today 12:40 pm
America has always had a love affair with its generals. It started at the founding of the republic with George Washington and continued with (among others) Andrew Jackson, Zachary Taylor, Ulysses S. Grant, and Dwight D. Eisenhower. These military men shared something in common: They were winning generals. Washington in the Revolution; Jackson in the War of 1812; Taylor in the Mexican-American War; Grant in the Civil War; and Ike, of course, in World War II. Americans have always loved a hero in uniformwhen he wins.
Yet 21st-century America is witnessing a new and revolutionary moment: the elevation of losing generals to the highest offices in the land. Retired Marine Corps general James Mad Dog Mattis, known as a tough-talking warrior-monk, will soon be the nations secretary of defense. Hell be joined by a real mad dog, retired Army lieutenant general Michael Flynn as President-elect Donald Trumps national-security adviser. Leading the Department of Homeland Security will be recently retired general John Kelly, another no-nonsense Marine. And even though he wasnt selected, retired Army general David Petraeus was seriously considered for secretary of state, further proof of Trumps starry-eyed fascination with the brass of our losing wars. Generals who fought in Iraq and Afghanistan to anything but victorypyrrhic ones dont countare again being empowered. This time, its as civilian advisers to Trump, a business tycoon whose military knowledge begins and ends with his invocation of two World War II generals, George S. Patton and Douglas MacArthur, as his all-time favorite military leaders.
Lets pause for a moment to consider those choices. Patton was a skilled commander of armored forces at the divisional and corps level, but lacked the political acumen and temperament to succeed at higher levels of command during World War II. MacArthur, notoriously vainglorious anddoes this ring a bell?completely narcissistic, was fired by President Harry Truman for insubordination during the Korean War. And yet these are the generals Trump professes to admire most. Not Omar Bradley, known as the GIs general; not Dwight Eisenhower, the man who led the D-Day invasion in 1944; and not, most of all, George C. Marshall, a giant of a man and the architect of military victory in World War II, who did indeed make a remarkably smooth transition to civilian service both as secretary of state and defense after the war.
snip//
Of Coups and Crusades
Collectively, the team of Mattis, Flynn, and Kelly could not be more symbolic of the ongoing process of subversion of civilian control of the military. With Trump holding their reins, these self-styled warriors will soon take charge of the highest civilian positions overseeing the military of the worlds sole superpower. Dont think of this, however, as a Seven Days in May scenario in which a hard-headed general mounts a coup against an allegedly soft-hearted president. Its far worse. Who needs a coup, when generals are essentially to be given free rein by a president-elect who fancies himself a military expert because, as a teenager, he spent a few years at a military-themed boarding school?
In all of this, Trump represents just the next (giant) step in an ongoing process. His warrior-steeds, his dream team of generals, highlight Americas striking 21st-century embrace of militarism. At the same time, the future of US foreign policy seems increasingly clear: more violent interventionism against what these men see as the existential threat of radical Islam. In the process, one radical idea will be pitted against another: American exceptionalism, armed to the teeth and empowered by war-lovers (some deeply involved in an evangelizing Christianity) against Islamic jihadist extremism. Rather than a clash of civilizations, its a clash of warring creeds, of what should essentially be seen as fundamentalist cults. Both embrace their own exceptionalism, both see themselves as righteous warriors, both represent ways of thinking steeped in patriarchy and saturated with violence, and both are remarkably resistant to any thought of compromise.
Put another way, under Trumps team of civilian warrior-generals, it looks like the crusades may be backwith a vengeance. Yet for all the president-elects tough talk about winning, count on the next four years, like the last 15, being filled to the brim with military frustrations rather than victory. And fear a second possibility as well. Whatever else they do, Trump and his generals are likely to produce one historically stunning result: the withering away of whats left of the American democratic experiment.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)call it a Oligarchy. Looking more like Poland with each passing day.
Wounded Bear
(58,774 posts)DemoTex
(25,407 posts)Trump is a fatally flawed character - the American Macbeth/Caesar. He is vapid and impotent, but vainglorious enough to suck up to the very generals he insulted during the campaign.
This cabal of rabid generals represents, figuratively, Trump's Banquo and Brutus. Thus, Trump should beware his (metaphorical) Ides of March and Birnham Wood. Small wonder Trump is keeping his own private Praetorian Guard on the the payroll. The man is staking his life on loyalty. So his paranoia runs deep. Good.
This will not end well for Trump. Or our nation. After all, it is a tragedy.