General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIssa: TRANSCRIPT of his Holder anti-gun conspiracy theory, from ABC's 'This Wk with Steph' Sunday June 24th
from ABC's 'This Wk with Steph' Sunday June 24th
According to Darrell Issa's own words this morning, Rachel Maddow was exactly right last week when she opined that the "contempt" proceedings against Atty Gen Eric Holder were motivated by a crazy theory of DOJ conspiracy against "Second Amendment rights". Before today, we knew already that Issa would not allow any public testimony by the rogue Phoenix ATF agents who, without Holder's knowledge, had continued Bush-era gunrunning to Mexico after President Obama was inaugurated. We knew already also that Issa's DOJ document requests applied only to the period AFTER the Phoenix gunrunning operation was discovered and shut down immediately.
What's new today is Issa's direct confirmation that Rachel Maddow had it exactly right in a show last week. This whole contempt imbroglio is seeking material to animate the NRA and other hysterical "Second Amendment rights" advocates. Below is a transcript of what Darrell Issa said in an interview by Jake Tapper.
He explains EXACTLY what he is fishing for in the DOJ documents over which his commitee has voted along party lines to request a House Contempt of Congress vote.
WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?
From http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/06/darrell-issa-tougher-gun-laws-may-have-been-aim-of-fast-and-furious/
"Sunday Sound: Heard on 'This Week', by Jake Tapper. Jun 24, 2012 1:39pm
Darrell Issa: Tougher Gun Laws May Have Been Aim of 'Fast and Furious'
This morning on 'This Week', Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., continued pressing a conspiracy theory that the botched 'Fast and Furious' operation could have been part of a larger plan by the Obama administration to push through tougher gun laws in the United States. But Issa had no firm evidence to back the claim, and said he could not be certain that gun control efforts were ever an original aim of sending guns across the border.
TAPPER: You really think that there's a possibility that they were sending guns across the border not because they were trying to get people in the Mexican drug cartels, ... but because they were trying to push gun control?
ISSA: Two things quickly. First of all, this was so flawed that you can't believe they expected to actually get criminal prosecutions as a result of it. So the level of flaw, if that's a word, here is huge.
But here's the real answer as to gun control. We have e-mail from people involved in this that are talking about using what they're finding here to support the basically assault weapons ban or greater reporting. So chicken or egg? We don't know which came first; we probably never will. We do know that during this this Fast and Furious operation, there were e-mails in which they're saying we can use this as part of additional reporting or things like assault weapons ban. So the people involved saw the benefit of what they were gathering. Whether or not that was their original purpose, we probably will never know.
And I take people at their word that this started off in some way as an idea where they could get good information, they could, in fact, roll up bad guys. But after it was out of control and people are saying, we're letting too many guns walk, those kinds of e-mails occurred, we have people who also were being opportunists. And, remember, Eric Holder issued a four-state reporting for long rifles and used what he had had here. Right in the middle of the scandal, he issues that for four states. They never needed this information. They never needed the reporting to get this information. These federally licensed gun dealers came to ATF and told them they had straw-buyers, told them they had suspicious buyers, and turned them on to the very people. And one of these people bought over 700 weapons, just one straw-buyer.
So it's very clear the system was working, where ATF was getting information voluntarily from licensed gun dealers. They don't need the additional reporting, but they got it anyway, and they used gun violence to the border and this operation as part of it. So I think when you look at the chicken or egg, there's proof that they certainly were opportunist."
spanone
(135,844 posts)ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)was his reason for ginning up a party-lines contempt vote against a Cabinet official of the other party during a presidential election campaign.
IMO this interview is HUGE.
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)is summarized and linked in the GD thread at URL
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002837308
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)seeking a partisan contempt of Congress citation during a Presidential campaign?
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)though, just jumps off the screen at me.
Sorry for taking you seriously at the wrong time!
Mollycares
(2 posts)Ick! Inside the mind of Issa. I need to take a shower now. God knows we need our assault weapons and all the John Wayne's we can get to keep the rich in power. Did you know that the concept of John Wayne was from early Jewish Hollywood to show how American the Jews could be. Issa has the "nationalism" thing down but we need to have level-headed and intelligent people in Congress. Please help the 49th Congressional District elect Democrat Jerry Tetalman instead of Issa. It is so appreciated! JerryforCongress2012.com