General Discussion

skip fox

(19,359 posts) Tue Jan 24, 2017, 05:51 PM Jan 2017

NASA climate change data. Will it disappear?

Today it took me a search and two clicks to find this. It used to take two clicks. Will it be in existence tomorrow?

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Please save the data. The most compelling argument I knos is based on the FACT that 97%+ of climate scientists agree climate change is occurring, man made, and terribly destructive. The above site has the proof.

The Rethugs say that 97% of scientists lie for promotion and grants. The people they portray as so open to brides have dedicated themselves to finding out about the truth of the physical universe. It makes no sense, but it needs the above data as a foundation for the argument.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NASA climate change data. Will it disappear? (Original Post) skip fox Jan 2017 OP

I read somewhere Phoenix61 Jan 2017 #1

Yep. Lindsay Jan 2017 #2

You're right. Of course they would. skip fox Jan 2017 #3

Nope. Warpy Jan 2017 #4

Phoenix61

(17,021 posts)

1. I read somewhere

Reply to skip fox (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2017, 05:52 PM

Jan 2017

that they started backing it up shortly after he won the election.

Lindsay

(3,276 posts)

2. Yep.

Reply to Phoenix61 (Reply #1)

Tue Jan 24, 2017, 05:55 PM

Jan 2017

Storing it on servers outside the US.

skip fox

(19,359 posts)

3. You're right. Of course they would.

Reply to Phoenix61 (Reply #1)

Tue Jan 24, 2017, 05:57 PM

Jan 2017

They're smart.

But as a matter of public debate, I could always point to the NASA site which containst the positions of all the major climate-science organizations along with extended position statements &c. It's great!

I'd hate to see it disappear.

Warpy

(111,378 posts)

4. Nope.

Reply to skip fox (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2017, 06:04 PM

Jan 2017

Ever notice that the tighter the Republicans try to screw the lid down on information, the more leaks the government springs?

We just won't read about it in the corporate US press.

Reply to this discussion