General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs Your Couch Trying to Kill You?
(Bloomberg) Imagine if government officials knew that certain chemicals were hazardous enough to cause health problems as serious as cancer and neurological defects, yet were largely powerless to restrict them.
That, in a nutshell, is the state of chemical regulation in the U.S. On paper, the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority to regulate or ban toxic substances. In practice, the agency faces so many hurdles that it hasnt tried to do so since it made an ill-fated run at asbestos in 1991.
More than two dozen states are nobly trying to fill the regulatory void. But Washington cannot abdicate its responsibility to protect public health. U.S. lawmakers should move swiftly to give the EPA true power to assess and regulate risky chemicals.
The agencys inadequate oversight of flame retardants, as revealed in a recent series of articles in the Chicago Tribune, illustrates the perils of weak federal rules. These chemicals are used in everything from couch cushions to televisions to airplanes, ostensibly to lower the risk of fire. However, the flame retardants most often used in such products are largely ineffective. They exist mainly because the chemical industry has pushed them aggressively. .................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-24/is-your-couch-trying-to-kill-you-.html
rug
(82,333 posts)but it's over 14 years old, so it's probably not the chemicals... the sagging from years of three teenage girls throwing themselves on it dramatically is more of a hazard.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)cbrer
(1,831 posts)I've suspected they were up to no good for quite some time...
I was watching the fork and the spoon this whole time.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)with the end tables. I sometimes hear snickering and rustling noises at night.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)I feel it has plans of regaining empire...
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)A classical American hero in it's deceptively quiet and totally laid back look, it nonetheless leaves no room for ottoman or other stoolies.
Phentex
(16,334 posts)surrealAmerican
(11,362 posts)... the consumer product safety commission, rather than the EPA?
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)So maybe it would like to party on RIKERS ISLAND. (That threat usually works for awhile.)
tomp
(9,512 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)klook
(12,157 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)TahitiNut
(71,611 posts)fwm
(12 posts)We bought a new couch, chair and ottoman from 2 well-known companies 3 years ago.
I can still smell the chemicals. Can't sit on either piece. Good thing we still have our old living room furniture from 30 years ago before they started using the flame retardants in the fabric and foam.
kdmorris
(5,649 posts)I'm pretty sensitive to chemicals, so I don't even have carpet in the house.
Festivito
(13,452 posts)I hope your sniffer does well for you in life.
And, I hope you find the good things around here in DU.
diane in sf
(3,914 posts)Finally gave up and bought a very expensive one made without chemicals and gave the smelly one to someone less sensitive. My recliner smelled for several years so I continued to sit on the floor until it outgassed sufficiently.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)I've tried to set them on fire a number of times
MADem
(135,425 posts)We don't throw anything out.
It's past due for an overhaul; in fact, we are going to bite the bullet and do that this year. It's not cheap but it is a good piece of furniture. We tend to fix things rather than toss them. It's just our way...!