Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 07:19 AM Jun 2012

Science or Sex: Which Does the Right Hate More?

http://www.alternet.org/story/155999/science_or_sex%3A_which_does_the_right_hate_more/

_640x426_310x220


A principal in Onalaska, Wash., was accused of “raping” her fifth-grade students. Not actually — this isn’t a case of, you know, rape-rape but rather rape as an inappropriate metaphor: “rape” by sex ed. James Gilliland, the parent of an 11-year-old girl who took C.J. Gray’s class on the birds and the bees, told Seattle’s KING 5 News: “It’s basically the same as raping a kid’s mind and taking their innocence.”

What got this father and other parents so fired up? In a recent lesson on HIV, Gray answered a student’s question about what oral sex and anal sex are. Onalaska superintendent Scott Fenter told KING 5, “She only gave factual information, no demonstrations.” Gray herself told Centralia, Wash.’s Chronicle, “It was very factual and it was dropped. I did not demonstrate it.” Yes, despite at least two parents likening her answering of kids’ questions to child molestation — and others inundating her with angry phone calls and letters — she did not actually demonstrate the act; there were no photos or videos, either. It was just a matter-of-fact explanation of the basic mechanics.

This small-town story has garnered national attention — and, of course, lit up conservative sites like Glenn Beck’s the Blaze and anti-choice outlets like LifeNews.com — because the backlash isn’t just about these kids or their hyperbolic parents; it’s really about a larger culture war, as well as fundamental, bipartisan fears about kids and sex. It’s a case study on the parental terror, ignorance and sometimes willful blindness that often accompanies the fight against comprehensive sex education.

The curriculum Gray was using, the Family Life and Sexual Health (FLASH) program, was developed in the state — despite conservatives’ claims that it was the result of Planned Parenthood’s “puppet-mastery.” The lesson plan for the HIV portion of the fifth- and sixth-grade classes explains, “We use the term ‘sexual intercourse’ as an umbrella expression to represent all three risky sexual behaviors: oral, anal and vaginal intercourse,” it says. “These will be spelled out in later grades.” But here’s the important part: “That’s not to say that you can’t define them simply if students ask about them.” That’s exactly what Gray did: A student asked about oral and anal sex, and she responded with a straightforward description.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Science or Sex: Which Does the Right Hate More? (Original Post) xchrom Jun 2012 OP
Sex. That's all about "the proper order" and making sure everyone... JHB Jun 2012 #1
We had a conversation about teen ignorance Sunday Lionessa Jun 2012 #2
Our generation was not necessarily any better. surrealAmerican Jun 2012 #3

JHB

(37,161 posts)
1. Sex. That's all about "the proper order" and making sure everyone...
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 07:31 AM
Jun 2012

... stays in their designated pigeon hole.

Their fear of science isn't nearly as consistent as their their fear of anyone getting out of line sexually.

 

Lionessa

(3,894 posts)
2. We had a conversation about teen ignorance Sunday
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 07:37 AM
Jun 2012

at an Atheist Meetup. Now I learned about sex in school, rudimentary, but the basic birds and bees, both educationally and through gossip-y arenas. This was mid-70s and in Texas. In a related conversation, as I was trying to get a point across, someone recognized my disconnect.

She says, "Oh I see, you think girls know how babies are made. They don't. In the small-ish, conservative town I grew up in, girls didn't understand how they're made until after they get pregnant the first time. Contraception isn't allowed to be discussed by school, and heavily discouraged of parents through the churches."

I am flabbergasted. How in the hell was it that my generation is more educated in the 70s than the current generation? This would be akin, in my mind, to having long division as the highest level of math available. Isn't education and glory of the written word supposed to be the ADVANCEMENT of education, not the regression of it?

I'm am once again dumbfounded by how un-exceptional we've become... well except apparently in our ability to market ourselves as benign superpower, that is still exceptional.

surrealAmerican

(11,362 posts)
3. Our generation was not necessarily any better.
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 08:02 AM
Jun 2012

Sex education in the 70's was very controversial. You were just lucky enough to live in a school district that did the right thing. It still a matter of where a child lives, and what their school board will approve.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Science or Sex: Which Doe...