Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just got an e-mail saying SC refused to hear Citizens United case from Montana. (Original Post) LiberalLoner Jun 2012 OP
I just read on Huffpo that they struck it down. n/t cynatnite Jun 2012 #1
So does that mean it's OK for Montana.. ananda Jun 2012 #2
Montana has to comply. n/t cynatnite Jun 2012 #3
Damn double damn! ananda Jun 2012 #5
Watching the SCOTUS Blog live. Savannahmann Jun 2012 #4
Oh I was going to delete because there was a better thread up but people have replied so I will LiberalLoner Jun 2012 #6
Link to opinion Shrek Jun 2012 #7
Montanna was reversed. Link to the decision (pdf)... PoliticAverse Jun 2012 #8
 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
4. Watching the SCOTUS Blog live.
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 10:17 AM
Jun 2012

The Montana campaign limits case was struck down. The Montana Supreme Court is overturned. Citizen United strikes again.

LiberalLoner

(9,762 posts)
6. Oh I was going to delete because there was a better thread up but people have replied so I will
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 10:18 AM
Jun 2012

leave it alone.

Lord knows, we have to get more liberal justices on the SC. Or else we are really doomed.

Shrek

(3,981 posts)
7. Link to opinion
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 10:18 AM
Jun 2012
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/11-1179h9j3.pdf

Justice Breyer in dissent:

Montana’s experience, like considerable experience elsewhere since the Court’s decision in Citizens United, casts grave doubt on the Court’s supposition that independent expenditures do not corrupt or appear to do so.

Were the matter up to me, I would vote to grant the petition for certiorari in order to reconsider Citizens United or, at least, its application in this case. But given the Court’s per curiam disposition, I do not see a significant possibility of reconsideration. Consequently, I vote instead to deny the petition.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just got an e-mail saying...