Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court Decision On Arizona’s Immigration Law Provides Strong Support For Obama’s Immigration
Supreme Court Decision On Arizonas Immigration Law Provides Strong Support For Obamas Immigration Order
By Judd Legum
Today, the Supreme Court issued a decision invalidating most of Arizonas controversial immigration law. Georgetown Law professor David Cole, a vocal civil liberties advocate, called the dcision almost a total victory for the Obama administration, which challenged the constitutionality of the law.
But the decision signaled that the court also views Obamas recent immigration directive, halting deportations for many young undocumented immigrants, as legal. Essentially, the court underscored that the federal government has broad discretion under the law to decide who to deport. From the decision:
Kris Kobach, an immigration advisor for Mitt Romney, said that Obamas order was illegal. It does not appear likely that the Supreme Court agrees.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/06/25/505671/supreme-court-decision-on-arizonas-immigration-law-provides-strong-support-for-obamas-immigration-order/
By Judd Legum
Today, the Supreme Court issued a decision invalidating most of Arizonas controversial immigration law. Georgetown Law professor David Cole, a vocal civil liberties advocate, called the dcision almost a total victory for the Obama administration, which challenged the constitutionality of the law.
But the decision signaled that the court also views Obamas recent immigration directive, halting deportations for many young undocumented immigrants, as legal. Essentially, the court underscored that the federal government has broad discretion under the law to decide who to deport. From the decision:
Congress has specified which aliens may be removed from the United States and the procedures for doing so. Aliens may be removed if they were inadmissible at the time of entry, have been convicted of certain crimes, or meet other criteria set by federal law. See §1227. Removal is a civil, not criminal, matter. A principal feature of the removal system is the broad discretion exercised by immigration officials. See Brief for Former Commissioners of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service as Amici Curiae 813 (hereinafter Brief for Former INS Commissioners).
Discretion in the enforcement of immigration law embraces immediate human concerns. Unauthorized workers trying to support their families, for example, likely pose less danger than alien smugglers or aliens who commit a serious crime. The equities of an individual case may turn on many factors, including whether the alien has children born in the United States, long ties to the community, or a record of distinguished military service.
Discretion in the enforcement of immigration law embraces immediate human concerns. Unauthorized workers trying to support their families, for example, likely pose less danger than alien smugglers or aliens who commit a serious crime. The equities of an individual case may turn on many factors, including whether the alien has children born in the United States, long ties to the community, or a record of distinguished military service.
Kris Kobach, an immigration advisor for Mitt Romney, said that Obamas order was illegal. It does not appear likely that the Supreme Court agrees.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/06/25/505671/supreme-court-decision-on-arizonas-immigration-law-provides-strong-support-for-obamas-immigration-order/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
13 replies, 3327 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (23)
ReplyReply to this post
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court Decision On Arizona’s Immigration Law Provides Strong Support For Obama’s Immigration (Original Post)
ProSense
Jun 2012
OP
"Discretion in the enforcement of immigration law embraces immediate human concerns."
pinto
Jun 2012
#2
RockaFowler
(7,429 posts)1. Great News
In your face Jan Brewer
LordJFT
(1,339 posts)5. and yet this is Jan Brewer's response
https://www.google.com/#hl=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=jan+brewer+response+to+sb+1070+ruling&oq=jan+brewer+response+to+sb+1070+ruling&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_l=hp.3...743.16076.0.16341.46.37.5.2.2.0.179.3221.24j10.34.0...0.0.pr2G2EXo5bQ&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=1aa16ab91934b999&biw=1025&bih=644
clearly this woman knows what's going on
clearly this woman knows what's going on
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)9. Oh my god, that is fucking crazy. She's batshit. Totally Orwellian.
WTF did I just read?
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)11. She's just so happy "driving while brown" stops are still legal
If I was Mitt Romney, and thank every deity I am not, I would pick Jan Brewer as my running mate. It would cost me every Hispanic voter in the country, but I won't get any of those anyway. And the teabaggers love her.
pinto
(106,886 posts)2. "Discretion in the enforcement of immigration law embraces immediate human concerns."
Igel
(35,320 posts)4. "The equities of an individual case may turn on many factors."
One person, many factors. Consider all the variables before deciding a case.
Rather different from, "The equities of applying the law to a group depends on a single factor."
patrice
(47,992 posts)3. K&R for all of us Dreamers!
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)6. K & R
spanone
(135,844 posts)7. k&r...
Tarheel_Dem
(31,235 posts)8. This puts Mitt in a bit of a pickle. I'm listening to NPR, and Dreamer Activists are planning.....
an all out voter registration drive to help the president get the last provision tossed. I think we can do this.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)10. Nonsense!
All I hear, over and over, on the news is how the SC decision is a great win for Brewer and AZ's papers please law!
Yeah.... right.....
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)12. K&R
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)13. one down and one to go
*crosses fingers*