Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 11:35 AM Jun 2012

Chuck Schumer: SCOTUS Decision ‘As Strong A Repudiation Of The Arizona Law’ As Possible

Chuck Schumer: SCOTUS Decision ‘As Strong A Repudiation Of The Arizona Law’ As Possible

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) cast the Supreme Court’s decision to invalidate portions of Arizona’s SB1070 immigration law while postponing a ruling on its most controversial decision as a major victory for opponents of the legislation in a statement:

“This is as strong a repudiation of the Arizona law as one could expect given that the law has not been implemented yet. Three linchpins of the Arizona law were struck down by a convincing majority of the Court as clearly violating federal law, and a fourth is on thin legal ice. The Court is sending a stern warning to Arizona that the provision allowing local law enforcement to check people’s immigration documents cannot be implemented in a discriminatory or draconian way, or it will be thrown out like the rest of the law.

“This decision tells us that states cannot take the law into their own hands and makes it clear that the only real solution to immigration reform is a comprehensive federal law. The decision should importune Republicans and Democrats to work together on this issue in a bipartisan way.”

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/chuck-schumer-scotus-decision-as-strong-repudiation-of


Arizona Dems: SB 1070 Ruling A ‘Call To Action’

Luis Heredia, executive director of the Arizona Democratic Party, said in a statement that Monday’s Supreme Court ruling on SB 1070 is a “call to action” to “elect leaders who will get our state back on track.” The statement also takes swipes at several Arizona Republicans and Mitt Romney.

“The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled section 2B of SB 1070 to be constitutional. That does not make it just or moral. Other parts were ruled unconstitutional as further evidence why this law is flawed.

The Arizona Democratic Party opposed SB 1070 in 2010. The Arizona Democratic Party opposes SB 1070 now. This law does nothing to protect or strengthen Arizona.

There was a time when Senator John McCain and Congressman Jeff Flake led the United States on immigration reform. Now, Governor Jan Brewer, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and others in the Arizona Republican Party lead us to nothing. Mitt Romney even mistakenly called SB 1070 a “model” for the nation.

This law is simply a tool of divisive voices for political gain, one that damages our state’s credibility and economy. As a result, Arizona families have paid the price with $23 million in lost tax revenue and at least $350 million lost in direct spending by convention-goers. SB 1070 has failed Arizona.

Today’s decision is a call to action. It reminds us of the rash and irresponsible overreach of the Republican Legislature. It also signals that now is the time to elect leaders who will get our state back on track. Arizona families deserve better politicians who respect law enforcement, work to create jobs and enact laws that will protect the individual rights of all citizens.

The Supreme Court has said section 2B of SB 1070 is constitutional. That does not make it right.”

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/arizona-dems-say-sb-1070-ruling-call-to
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chuck Schumer: SCOTUS Decision ‘As Strong A Repudiation Of The Arizona Law’ As Possible (Original Post) ProSense Jun 2012 OP
I don't know the r/w, and yahoo implied it was a victory for them because they can stop anyone who still_one Jun 2012 #1
Whistling in the dark malthaussen Jun 2012 #2

still_one

(92,223 posts)
1. I don't know the r/w, and yahoo implied it was a victory for them because they can stop anyone who
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 11:44 AM
Jun 2012

looks a certain way

Here is the link for the actually yahoo headline:

Supreme Court upholds key part of Arizona immigration law, strikes down rest

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/supreme-court-upholds-key-part-arizona-immigration-law-141927514.html

So by this spin it was a victory for racist around the country



malthaussen

(17,204 posts)
2. Whistling in the dark
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 12:12 PM
Jun 2012

There is no legal definition of "discriminatory or draconian." The law as stands allows Arizona to do whatever it pleases, and forces the burden of proof onto the victims of discrimination. It is, in fact, much the same situation as the "Stop and Frisk" laws in NYC.

In short, it is like many laws going up in RW states across the nation, welfare drug testing, e.g. The presumption is of guilt, and you must prove your innocence.

-- Mal

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chuck Schumer: SCOTUS Dec...