Here is where the Presidential election will be stolen
William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution, published a study last month assuming three different scenarios for turnout and voting margins among whites and minorities in the upcoming November election.
. . .
The third Frey scenario calls for white turnout and voting patterns to replicate those of 2004, and for minority turnout and voting patterns to replicate 2008 — “something closer to what this year’s election promises – strong partisan participation by both whites and minorities.” In this case, Frey writes, “results favor an Obama win – but barely.”
According to Frey’s third scenario, “Obama squeaks by with 292 electoral votes spread among 24 states,” but his victory depends on winning by very slim margins in four key states — Florida, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Oregon — which together have 66 electoral college votes, far more than enough to tip the contest to Romney if they go the other way.
Frey’s analysis demonstrates a crucial fact about current presidential politics: that white voters (76 percent) and minorities (24 percent), despite making up vastly different percentages of the electorate, are both key to the outcome. Little shifts in behavior in either group matter.
http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/25/white-working-chaos/?hp
The three largest of these four states have Republican Governors. This is where the election will be stolen.
= new reply since forum marked as read
When the exit polls and the results are in sync, we can glean there is not a stolen election. When they do not, we can plainly see otherwise.
Now why don't you try and tell me that exit polls aren't reliable so you can show yourself to others?
Oh, and "Welcome to DU" 
