Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will Any Democrat Challenge The Constitutionality Of These Executive Orders?..... (Original Post) global1 Jan 2017 OP
K & R SammyWinstonJack Jan 2017 #1
K&R Me. Jan 2017 #2
Trumps Immigration Ban Is Illegal. elleng Jan 2017 #3
The ACLU has been staffing up and getting ready grantcart Jan 2017 #4
Thank Goodness bdamomma Jan 2017 #10
K&R! gademocrat7 Jan 2017 #5
Yes, but all we can do is sue. dawg Jan 2017 #6
And The More Noise That We Make - As Long As We Keep Associating Trump & The Repugs.... global1 Jan 2017 #8
I saw two Dem reps at JFK earlier today. babylonsister Jan 2017 #7
If they don't, we've moved one step closer to totalitarianism without a shot fired. Rex Jan 2017 #9
I'm not sure that they themselves can (house members/senators) sue SaschaHM Jan 2017 #11
I think the attorneys had to wait until the immigration EO was put into effect... Princess Turandot Jan 2017 #12

elleng

(130,956 posts)
3. Trumps Immigration Ban Is Illegal.
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 07:19 PM
Jan 2017

'President Trump signed an executive order on Friday that purports to bar for at least 90 days almost all permanent immigration from seven majority-Muslim countries, including Syria and Iraq, and asserts the power to extend the ban indefinitely.

But the order is illegal. More than 50 years ago, Congress outlawed such discrimination against immigrants based on national origin.

That decision came after a long and shameful history in this country of barring immigrants based on where they came from. Starting in the late 19th century, laws excluded all Chinese, almost all Japanese, then all Asians in the so-called Asiatic Barred Zone. Finally, in 1924, Congress created a comprehensive “national-origins system,” skewing immigration quotas to benefit Western Europeans and to exclude most Eastern Europeans, almost all Asians, and Africans.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/27/opinion/trumps-immigration-ban-is-illegal.html?

dawg

(10,624 posts)
6. Yes, but all we can do is sue.
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 07:21 PM
Jan 2017

Since the people gave the Republicans all branches of government, all Democrats can really do is make noise.

global1

(25,251 posts)
8. And The More Noise That We Make - As Long As We Keep Associating Trump & The Repugs....
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 07:30 PM
Jan 2017

will pay big time in 2018. We need massive voter turnout in 2018 so we can take back both the House & Senate. That is the only way we will be able to contain Trump & the Repugs.

We need to get as many Americans as we can to the polls knowing that it is the Repugs that are the culprits. Trump is their useful idiot. And that the Dems will right the wrongs that these people created.

babylonsister

(171,067 posts)
7. I saw two Dem reps at JFK earlier today.
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 07:28 PM
Jan 2017

Nydia Velasquez was one and Jerry Nadler was the other. Both were beyond angry.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
9. If they don't, we've moved one step closer to totalitarianism without a shot fired.
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 07:30 PM
Jan 2017

Now is not the time to keep the powder dry.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
11. I'm not sure that they themselves can (house members/senators) sue
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 07:40 PM
Jan 2017

Yes, the House and the Senate as legislative bodies can sue, but absent a democratic majority, I don't see that occurring.

I don't think individual members have the standing to sue on behalf of congress.

Princess Turandot

(4,787 posts)
12. I think the attorneys had to wait until the immigration EO was put into effect...
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 07:45 PM
Jan 2017

...and for someone to be harmed by it in order to go to court, since it did not involve an actual law passed/signed by Trump. (Unlike that idiotic Texas aborted tissue funeral law, for example, where it was challenged in federal court shortly after it was signed into law.)

From what I read, the EO didn't even provide much in specifics for the TSA; they apparently stopped green card holders from returning home to the U.S. because they weren't explicitly told which categories of travelers they were supposed to stop. (Now, of course, the trumpsters decided that they should be stopped.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will Any Democrat Challen...