General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRaising the minimum wage -
I think the wage has to go up - but I can also see that his might be a problem for many small businesses. At the same time, the tax payer is subsidizing low wages already through food stamps, heating grants, public housing etc. I think Wal-Mart can take the hit, but I'm not so certain about the guy running the snow plow/lawn mowing business down the street. Would you favor raising the minimum wage and giving small business owners a temporary write-off of some sort?
7 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
The wage should be raised - with no payments to companies | |
6 (86%) |
|
The wage should be raised - with a disappearing write-off to companies of a certain size | |
1 (14%) |
|
The wage should be raised - with a disapppearing write-off for all companies. | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
hunter
(38,317 posts)People are not shopping in your store or eating at your restaurants because they have no money.
The very wealthy don't shop in your store.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)ditto
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)I could look it up, but we have some members here with expertise on the subject who probably will be weighing in with their knowledge and insights.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)up to a certain point.
Say twice the median income.
So roughly $100,000. For small companies that should mean they can deduct all the money used to pay all their employees as well as themselves.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)companies already do, per se, as they are only taxed on profit...and salaries are an expense...
sP
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)to *only* allow them to deduct up to a certain point for wages.
For small companies being able to deduct all wages/benefits up to some reasonable amount (I just pulled 100k out of a hat, I'm not married to it) plus expenses, plus investment in infrastructure, and so on would effectively leave them paying no business taxes (federally).
It would then only hit large companies and only wages above that amount, savings, stock holders, and perhaps money spent on advertising (I am on the fence on that one).
/also only counting expenses/salaries paid here. Not in other countries.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)Initech
(100,081 posts)And wage theft by employers should be considered felony theft and we should have protections put in place to allow unionization by employees.