Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,479 posts)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 12:39 AM Jan 2017

Loving, the movie

Go and see this slow but fact based movie to realize, again, what the yahoos mean when they want to "take American back."

For years here, when, during the heated primary debates I posted that the only thing that matters is the Supreme Court, I cited Loving v. Virginia, from 1967, that prohibited the ban on interracial marriage; Also Griswold v. Connecticut from 1967 that prohibited the ban on birth control, also Lawrence v. Texas from 2003! that struck down sodomy laws.

And, of course, Roe v. Wade and the recent ones allowing for same sex marriage.

But, hey, they want to take us back to these dark days.

We are older boomer and my spouse had hard time grasping that these events, also the civil rights movement, took place during our life time, when we were already adults, in college. It is not ancient history.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Loving, the movie (Original Post) question everything Jan 2017 OP
"Loving" will be available True Dough Jan 2017 #1
I am no movie critic but this is nonsense. question everything Jan 2017 #2

True Dough

(17,305 posts)
1. "Loving" will be available
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 12:47 AM
Jan 2017

on DVD and cable during the first week of February, so people can watch it at home if they prefer.

My wife and I have been eagerly awaiting it to be available on cable, but then she heard a movie critic last week say it was not as good as it could have been because the background of the lead female character is downplayed. He said it's not as racially/culturally inclusive as it should be, instead giving too much of the "white" perspective. I have no sense of whether that is a valid point, but it tempered my wife's desire to see the film a little.

question everything

(47,479 posts)
2. I am no movie critic but this is nonsense.
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 12:58 AM
Jan 2017

It certainly does not give it from the "white" perspective. What was interesting to me is how it started - blacks and whites in rural Virginia spending time together, car racing, dancing, drinking. They all treated each other as pals.

And.. there were no KKK. Spouse said that had it been the opposite - white wife and black husband - the KKK may have arrived.

They both suffered and, I suppose, the husband being the only one working, it was hard on him to move and to find a new job in D.C. They both missed their families, their friends, their old way of life.

Both of them were arrested.

And, yes, the court system was dominated by whites. That's the way it was in the last 50s early 60s. The sheriff and the judge, the attorney and the ACLU pro bono lawyers. Also the reporters.

It came back to a discount movie theaters so we saw it at $2.50 a ticket

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Loving, the movie