Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
2. "Stop doing anything that can be construed as free speech without a permit"
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 12:19 PM
Jan 2017

That should be enough to get HIM locked up!

brooklynite

(94,587 posts)
3. Okay, I'm actually going to go with Lopez on this one...
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 12:28 PM
Jan 2017

...you DO have the right to speak freely; you DO NOT have the right to speak freely everywhere. You cannot, for example bring your free speech into a private home or business without permission. You also cannot bring your free speech into a public setting (say, the middle of a street or a Courthouse doorway) where doing so disrupts other people's usage of the same facility. This is, I believe, where the problem lies. The protest, arguably is disrupting the flow of airline passengers and other airport customers, and that's why, LEGALLY, you can be required to obtain a permit for a protest. Now POLITICALLY, that can be a foolish thing to restrict, especially in the current climate. In NYS, Governor Cuomo directed Port Authority staff to allow the protest to continue.

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
6. The point of this thread is the statement, "I cannot carry a copy of the constitution
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 12:47 PM
Jan 2017

without a permit," and Lopez's answer, "Correct."

There is no way to play that statement as consistent with the constitution.



brooklynite

(94,587 posts)
7. If someone carted in a replica of the 10 Commandments and spouted Bible verses...
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 12:59 PM
Jan 2017

...the same rules would apply. The issue was not having a copy of the Constitution, it was using one as a prop (clearly evident in the video) as part of the protest.

Ms. Toad

(34,074 posts)
8. The person speaking was male,
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 01:09 PM
Jan 2017

The poster was being held by a woman. So I don't know what he was carrying.

But even assuming it was the same poster, the poster itself was not disruptive. Unless there is a uniformly enforced prohibition on carrying signs with visible writing (like, say, the signs seen very frequently in airports, held up to help people find their rides) they create a ban or selectively enforce one against carrying signs against political speech (the most protected speech).

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
10. I don't think the writers of the Constitution would agree
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 01:16 PM
Jan 2017
“Stop doing anything that could be construed as free speech without a permit,” he explains.

Lopez warns in the video, which lacks context, that even carrying a copy of the U.S. Constitution was prohibited in the airport.

“I cannot carry the Constitution without a permit?” one protester asks.

“Correct,” the officer replies.
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/01/denver-police-to-protesters-stop-doing-anything-that-could-be-construed-as-free-speech/


The question was NOT whether he could display the Constitution, it was if he could CARRY it.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
9. I agree with you that technically he is right
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 01:12 PM
Jan 2017

And also agree with you that a Police Chief should have enough sense about trying to keep public order that it is not helpful to tell people that they should restrict their speech or not spout the constitution when people are angry but behaving peacefully.

logosoco

(3,208 posts)
5. WOW!!!!
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 12:40 PM
Jan 2017

I took a class on the Constitution when I was working on my AA. The teacher told me the completion of the class gave me "Constitutional competence in the state of Missouri" at the time I just laughed! Now I am so glad I took that course!!!

politicat

(9,808 posts)
13. Tweet at the mayor and the incoming district attorney.
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 03:49 PM
Jan 2017

@MayorHancock and @BethMcCann5280

If this officer can't understand the first amendment, how can he be trusted with the 4th, 5th or 8th?

If you're in Colorado, Denver is part of your orbit, even if you're Western Slope. If you're not from CO, remind the Mayor of those precious tourist and innovation dollars.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Denver police commander t...