General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat Bannon is doing is creating what is known as a "Shock Event".
Heather Cox Richardson of Boston College is one of my favorite historians. I highly recommend her most recent book To Make Men Free: A History of the Republican Party.
Today Richardson gave me permission to publish a piece she recently posted to her Facebook page.
Richardson is probably right in assuming that Steve Bannon is behind Trumps recent Executive Order on Muslim refugees. She describes what Bannon is doing as a shock event. This is an attempt to throw the country into confusion and chaos so that the administration can present itself as the only entity capable of restoring order.
Richardson explains:
From Prof Richardson:
I dont like to talk about politics on Facebook political history is my job, after all, and you are my friends but there is an important non-partisan point to make today.
What Bannon is doing, most dramatically with last nights ban on immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries is creating what is known as a shock event. Such an event is unexpected and confusing and throws a society into chaos. People scramble to react to the event, usually along some fault line that those responsible for the event can widen by claiming that they alone know how to restore order.
What Bannon is doing, most dramatically with last night's ban on immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries-- is creating what is known as a "shock event."
When opponents speak out, the authors of the shock event call them enemies. As society reels and tempers run high, those responsible for the shock event perform a sleight of hand to achieve their real goal, a goal they know to be hugely unpopular, but from which everyone has been distracted as they fight over the initial event. There is no longer concerted opposition to the real goal; opposition divides along the partisan lines established by the shock event.
Last nights Executive Order has all the hallmarks of a shock event. It was not reviewed by any governmental agencies or lawyers before it was released, and counterterrorism experts insist they did not ask for it. People charged with enforcing it got no instructions about how to do so. Courts immediately have declared parts of it unconstitutional, but border police in some airports are refusing to stop enforcing it.
Predictably, chaos has followed and tempers are hot.
My point today is this: unless you are the person setting it up, it is in no ones interest to play the shock event game. It is designed explicitly to divide people who might otherwise come together so they cannot stand against something its authors think they wont like. I dont know what Bannon is up to although I have some guesses but because I know Bannons ideas well, I am positive that there is not a single person whom I consider a friend on either side of the aisle and my friends range pretty widely who will benefit from whatever it is. If the shock event strategy works, though, many of you will blame each other, rather than Bannon, for the fallout. And the country will have been tricked into accepting their real goal.
But because shock events destabilize a society, they can also be used positively. We do not have to respond along old fault lines. We could just as easily reorganize into a different pattern that threatens the people who sparked the event. A successful shock event depends on speed and chaos because it requires knee-jerk reactions so that people divide along established lines. This, for example, is how Confederate leaders railroaded the initial southern states out of the Union. If people realize they are being played, though, they can reach across old lines and reorganize to challenge the leaders who are pulling the strings. This was Lincolns strategy when he joined together Whigs, Democrats, Free-Soilers, anti-Nebraska voters, and nativists into the new Republican Party to stand against the Slave Power. Five years before, such a coalition would have been unimaginable. Members of those groups agreed on very little other than that they wanted all Americans to have equal economic opportunity. Once they began to work together to promote a fair economic system, though, they found much common ground. They ended up rededicating the nation to a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
Confederate leaders and Lincoln both knew about the political potential of a shock event. As we are in the midst of one, it seems worth noting that Lincoln seemed to have the better idea about how to use it.
https://thewayofimprovement.com/2017/01/29/historian-heather-cox-richardson-on-trumps-muslim-ban-its-a-shock-event/
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/616283.page
DinahMoeHum
(21,794 posts)n/t
csziggy
(34,136 posts)January 29, 2017 / johnfea
for having my back csziggy
RESIST,
kp
Stuart G
(38,428 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)What they promised. That justifies it but I think more important is what he's doing by decapitating Intelligence services, State Department and so forth.
The ban is more of a distraction since what he has planned upcoming is much more far reaching and will consolidate his power.
Dems fussing over the ban yes but please look at the bigger picture of total control
starshine00
(531 posts)no matter what befalls the US. He needs to stay off twitter, stop lying stop mistreating his wife in public, comb his hair, stop painting himself orange, etc.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)connections. Like Putin.
Read up on the recent changes that put Bannon in control of our security and our country and our lives
lunatica
(53,410 posts)The kind of thinking that if Trump only understood something that he would then act accordingly is useless. He understands what other think he should do. He isn't going to do that because his goal, his agenda is what he will pursue and he'll do it by acting and doing exactly what he wants.
Just because he acts stupid doesn't mean he's stupid. He's just fooling us like a magician does. He has us looking at his right hand while his left hand is doing the sleight of hand.
starshine00
(531 posts)for example the women's march and the whole reproductive rights thing, like if only they understood our message etc. The understand it but they disagree. Our uteri are means of production, empire, outbreeding the threats to sovereignty and empire, etc. Some people don't understand that. They need us poor, uneducated and deranged from being raised by miserable women with way too many children and no resources to care for them. It is the perfect storm for their vision of Utopia, which is medievalism and endless war for profit.
irisblue
(32,980 posts)#BannonPuppetMasterTrumpIsThePuppet.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)The problem with this sort of thing as I see it, too many mistakes.
TrekLuver
(2,573 posts)his greaseball ass.
ProfessorPlum
(11,257 posts)it is right out of Naomi Klein's must-read book "The Shock Doctrine"
2naSalit
(86,643 posts)Been saying it for a while now. It is that if it's any one identifiable "big picture" situation.
"This is an attempt to throw the country into confusion and chaos so that the administration can present itself as the only entity capable of restoring order. "
Well it seems that they have screwed the pooch on this one. 45 and his Golem are trying to pull a 'SQUIRREL" as he does things like release the name of his SCOTUS pick.
2naSalit
(86,643 posts)We've seen this picture before, action is needed to regain our country.
Johnny2X2X
(19,066 posts)Probably nothing more than probing to see how the country responds. People are still underestimating the depravity of this group in the White House.
The real "Shock Event" will be much more jarring than what transpired this weekend. My guess is it will involve federal troops occupying a major US city and trampling on the rights of the people there. Maybe Chicago, maybe a sanctuary city for immigrants.
And Trump is very close to putting a stop to these 'embarrassing" demonstrations against him. He's going to have a force out there brutalizing protesters very soon.
And the first journalist will be jailed for speaking against him before the Summer.
Eyeball_Kid
(7,432 posts)Trumpy signs anything coming from President Bannon.
Johnny2X2X
(19,066 posts)I wonder how this country will react if they send the military into the Southside of Chicago to start terrorizing blacks. They'll probably start with highly militarized deportation forces invading neighborhoods and brutalizing families with impunity. The public will care less if those being harmed speak Spanish.
And everyone needs to keep in mind that they're going to start framing this extremism in a way that makes a lot of the country get totally behind it. They're going to start using single events as justification. Just wait until a real attack happens, they are going to completely overreact.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)sewing discord to draw out to their enemies
Actually FDR talked about it in 1940, Thom is playing excerpts
bora13
(860 posts)Girl you thought he was a man
But he was a muffin
He hung around till you found
That he didn't know nuthin'
Girl you thought he was a man
But he only was a-puffin'
No cries is heard in the night
As a result of him stuffin'
IamFortunesFool
(348 posts)Haha... Great context for the Zappa
+1000
Pass this information on--it is of vital importance!
Hekate
(90,708 posts)spedtr90
(719 posts)subtitle: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism
This past week reminded me of this book from 2007 about using shocks and violence to implement radical policies; starting in Chile in 1973 and into the Bush years in Iraq. These recent "shock events" fit right in. An amazing book.
ProfessorPlum
(11,257 posts)really second your recommendation - this book should be read by everyone in the country. It is honest about what the US and other regimes actually do to countries and people to control them. And what, in the end, can be done to take power back from the horrible people who have wielded it too long.
SansACause
(520 posts)He literally campaigned for a year on this. Maybe people are shocked that he actually went through with it, but I generally believe people when they tell me what they are going to do.
That's exactly what I told my 88 year old friend who called scared out of her wits. I said, "He said he would do exactly this, and people voted for him anyway. Why are you surprised?"
AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)He did what he promised. But he did so without properly vetting the EO by Justice Dept. so it was flawed intentionally to create chaos. Massive deportations are about to start and will create MUCH bigger chaos but, again, he campained on it. What he did not campaign on is starting a war or destroy the entire governmet.
Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)Let's face it - Trump is a dullard. He is incapable of creating these masterful strokes. He is noting more than Brannon's sock puppet - a crude caricature in clown face makeup.
*I wonder how Trump's ego will handle this sort of narrative?
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)All that Bannon has proven so far is that he and Trump are absolutely, completely, and utterly incompetent. They are totally incapable of managing anything.
Even a military coup would look good in comparison.
manicraven
(901 posts)those who were lazy, sleeping, apathetic, or didn't really believe what he stated are now waking up. Let's hope they turn out and vote next time and also pay attention. For the rest of us, we saw this coming.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)The war against the liberal consensus began as a backlash against Roosevelts New Deal. Trump has simply stripped away its genteel veneer
reed is good, Gordon Gekko assured Americans in the 1987 film Wall Street. The slick financier spoke as a new American who rejected the social values of the 1960s and was shaped instead by the Reagan revolution. That new American thrilled to Ronald Reagans assertion that the nation succeeded when it unleashed the energy and individual genius of man and cheered his conclusion that unnecessary and excessive growth of government was at the root of the problems of the 1970s the ailing economy, racial unrest and broken families. If only they were free from government interference, Reagans voters believed, they and their families would prosper again. As Reagan promised in his 1981 inaugural address, the country would begin an era of national renewal.
What many of his supporters could not see was that Reagans cheery individualism was the folksy and palatable face of an extremist political ideology designed to overturn the popular post-Second World War liberal consensus.
When the bottom dropped out of the economy during the Great Depression, Americans voted Franklin Delano Roosevelt into office and threw their weight behind the Democrats New Deal policies regulating business, protecting workers and promoting basic social welfare. Most Republicans recognised the dangers of an unregulated economy and abandoned their pro-business stance of the 1920s. When the Republican president Dwight Eisenhower took office in 1953, he extended the New Deal with a series of policies he called the Middle Way. In the 1950s, business regulations, workers organisations, social welfare legislation and civil rights decisions placed the nation on a path to increasing prosperity. Americans rallied around the consensus shared by both parties that the government must play an active role in regulating the economy and promoting social welfare.
But big businessmen loathed business regulation and the taxes necessary to fund social welfare programmes. They carped that the liberal consensus was socialism. In 1951, William F Buckley Jr, an oilmans son fresh out of Yale, suggested that the only way to combat the New Deals popularity was to fight the Enlightenment superstition that the honest examination of arguments based on factual evidence would advance society. The fact that Americans had chosen the socialism and secularism of the liberal consensus showed that people could not be trusted to choose wisely. Free market capitalism and Christianity must be accepted as the only starting points of political and economic policy: they were as immutable as the Ten Commandments.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/29/trump-america-more-things-change-more-they-stay-the-same