Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(182,830 posts)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 08:54 PM Jan 2017

***BOOM*** Acting AG says Justice Department will not defend refugee executive order in court

http://www.nbc12.com/story/34382990/acting-ag-says-justice-department-will-not-defend-refugee-executive-order-in-court

WASHINGTON, D.C. (WWBT/AP) -
Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, a Democratic appointee, says she's directed Justice Department attorneys not to defend President Donald Trump's executive order on refugees.

Yates released the following statement:

My role is different from that of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), which, through administrations of both parties, has reviewed Executive Orders for form and legality before they are issued. OLC's review is limited to the narrow question of whether, in OLC's view, a proposed Executive Order is lawful on its face and properly drafted. Its review does not take account of statements made by an administration or it surrogates close in time to the issuance of an Executive Order that may bear on the order's purpose. And importantly, it does not address whether any policy choice embodied in an Executive Order is wise or just.

Similarly, in litigation, DOJ Civil Division lawyers are charged with advancing reasonable legal arguments that can be made supporting an Executive Order. But my role as leader of this institution is different and broader. My responsibility is to ensure that the position of the Department of Justice is not only legally defensible, but is informed by our best view of what the law is after consideration of all the facts. In addition, I am responsible for ensuring that the positions we take in court remain consistent with this institution's solemn obligation to always seek justice and stand for what is right. At present, I am not convinced that the defense of the Executive Order is consistent with these responsibilities nor am I convinced that the Executive Order is lawful.

Consequently, for as long as I am the Acting Attorney General, the Department of Justice will not present arguments in defense of the Executive Order, unless and until I become convinced that it is appropriate to do so.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
***BOOM*** Acting AG says Justice Department will not defend refugee executive order in court (Original Post) underpants Jan 2017 OP
Beautiful writing, well said AAG Yates. (And well done.) NT enough Jan 2017 #1
How long before he fires her? Generic Brad Jan 2017 #2
As soon as Sessions is confirmed underpants Jan 2017 #4
All the more reason to delay that comfirmation as long as possible. n/t dixiegrrrrl Jan 2017 #5
He could not wait until morning Generic Brad Jan 2017 #6
You're right. Fired her last night. underpants Jan 2017 #7
Thank you! Cha Jan 2017 #3
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»***BOOM*** Acting AG says...