Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,290 posts)
Wed Feb 1, 2017, 10:13 PM Feb 2017

Why Democrats should hold the line and filibuster against Neil Gorsuch

In nominating Neil Gorsuch to the supreme court, Donald Trump, just gave Senate Republicans exactly what they’ve long hoped for in filling Antonin Scalia’s vacant seat – and Democrats should do everything in their power to stop it.

It’s not that Gorsuch’s record is significantly more problematic than that of anyone else on Trump’s shortlist (he is, in many ways, merely Scalia’s ideological twin). It’s that Scalia’s successor should have rightfully been Obama’s to choose, and Democrats should return the favor by pushing Republicans to the legal limit, including making Republicans eliminate the filibuster on supreme court nominations.

Senate Republicans shamelessly played out the clock on the president’s dwindling tenure. After vowing to filibuster anyone Obama picked, they lived up to their word in refusing to hold a single confirmation hearing even for his eventual highly moderate selection of Merrick Garland. It was the perfect cherry atop an administration marked by Republican intransigence and opposition to practically every policy proposal put forward by the president.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/why-democrats-should-hold-the-line-and-filibuster-against-neil-gorsuch/ar-AAmtNFd?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=edgsp

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Democrats should hold the line and filibuster against Neil Gorsuch (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 2017 OP
Michael Moore is right: Any Democrat that votes for him should be primaried. Squinch Feb 2017 #1
Easier said than done. guillaumeb Feb 2017 #4
Very well said! Chasstev365 Feb 2017 #2
"After vowing to filibuster anyone Obama picked" - they didn't need to filibuster Obama's apointee PoliticAverse Feb 2017 #3

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
3. "After vowing to filibuster anyone Obama picked" - they didn't need to filibuster Obama's apointee
Wed Feb 1, 2017, 10:18 PM
Feb 2017

as Republicans had the majority in the Senate.

The filibuster is a tactic of those in the minority.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Democrats should hold...