General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Democrats should hold the line and filibuster against Neil Gorsuch
In nominating Neil Gorsuch to the supreme court, Donald Trump, just gave Senate Republicans exactly what theyve long hoped for in filling Antonin Scalias vacant seat and Democrats should do everything in their power to stop it.
Its not that Gorsuchs record is significantly more problematic than that of anyone else on Trumps shortlist (he is, in many ways, merely Scalias ideological twin). Its that Scalias successor should have rightfully been Obamas to choose, and Democrats should return the favor by pushing Republicans to the legal limit, including making Republicans eliminate the filibuster on supreme court nominations.
Senate Republicans shamelessly played out the clock on the presidents dwindling tenure. After vowing to filibuster anyone Obama picked, they lived up to their word in refusing to hold a single confirmation hearing even for his eventual highly moderate selection of Merrick Garland. It was the perfect cherry atop an administration marked by Republican intransigence and opposition to practically every policy proposal put forward by the president.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/why-democrats-should-hold-the-line-and-filibuster-against-neil-gorsuch/ar-AAmtNFd?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=edgsp
Squinch
(51,026 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Especially in a politics dominated by big money.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)And I bet you $100 they cave like they always do!
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)as Republicans had the majority in the Senate.
The filibuster is a tactic of those in the minority.