Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

malaise

(269,056 posts) Sat Feb 4, 2017, 10:06 AM Feb 2017

Was 'outrageous' contempt?

Why was it deleted so quickly

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Was 'outrageous' contempt? (Original Post) malaise Feb 2017 OP

They revised the WH statement to drop the word after 10 minutes pinboy3niner Feb 2017 #1

How about referring to Judge Robart as a "so-called judge" oberliner Feb 2017 #2

Good point malaise Feb 2017 #3

This, coming from a "so-called president." Nt. thucythucy Feb 2017 #4

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)

1. They revised the WH statement to drop the word after 10 minutes

Reply to malaise (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2017, 10:15 AM

Feb 2017

And then Trump tweets that the judge's opinion is "ridiculous."

They really don't have their act together, do they? It's like the big hand doesn't know what the little hand is doing.