General Discussion

brooklynite

(94,598 posts) Thu Feb 9, 2017, 02:55 PM Feb 2017

You may have seen this circulating on Twitter (Steve Bannon's apparently not so bad...)...

Link to tweet

Well, I posted a replacement:

Link to tweet

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You may have seen this circulating on Twitter (Steve Bannon's apparently not so bad...)... (Original Post) brooklynite Feb 2017 OP

Brilliant! mcar Feb 2017 #1

You just beat me to it. underpants Feb 2017 #2

Oh FFS! Lucinda Feb 2017 #3

That's the bar?! Are these people serious? They're for real? Oh, good God ck4829 Feb 2017 #4

Give Bannon time, he will be far more destructive to the world....only 18 days in do not forget. Fred Sanders Feb 2017 #5

Scroll down on the link. there are a few more comparison charts that are also excellent. Amaryllis Feb 2017 #6

mcar

(42,334 posts)

1. Brilliant!

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu Feb 9, 2017, 02:56 PM

Feb 2017

underpants

(182,829 posts)

2. You just beat me to it.

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu Feb 9, 2017, 02:57 PM

Feb 2017

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/fox-news-uses-ridiculous-graphic-to-prove-steve-bannon-is-better-than-isis-leader-al-baghdadi/

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)

3. Oh FFS!

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu Feb 9, 2017, 02:57 PM

Feb 2017

That is their defense of Bannon?

ck4829

(35,077 posts)

4. That's the bar?! Are these people serious? They're for real? Oh, good God

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu Feb 9, 2017, 03:00 PM

Feb 2017

My laptop is a stone age device, lower on a technological scale than an abacus, as long as that thing is on my screen.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)

5. Give Bannon time, he will be far more destructive to the world....only 18 days in do not forget.

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu Feb 9, 2017, 03:02 PM

Feb 2017

Amaryllis

(9,524 posts)

6. Scroll down on the link. there are a few more comparison charts that are also excellent.

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu Feb 9, 2017, 03:46 PM

Feb 2017

Reply to this discussion