General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJason Chaffetz: Kellyanne Conway Promoting Ivanka Trumps Products Was "Unacceptable"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/jason-chaffetz-kellyanne-conway-ivanka-trump_us_589cc506e4b04061313c4571?v7usdcxr&
Chaffetz told reporters on Capitol Hill that Conways remarks were clearly over the line and unacceptable, and that he and the top Democrat on the committee, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), would jointly refer Conway to the Office of Government Ethics for an investigation.
It should have never happened, and they better learn this lesson very quick, Chaffetz told NBC.
Chaffetz was referring to Conways appearance on Fox and Friends Thursday morning, when she defended President Donald Trumps attack against Nordstrom for dropping his daughters fashion line by advertising the brand.
Conway appeared to violate a federal regulation stating that government employees cannot use their public office to endorse products, quickly raising complaints from ethics watchdog groups.
drray23
(7,633 posts)I wonder if he is seeing the wind starting to blow in the other direction and does not want to be seen in cohoot with an administration that is very likely to end up impeached.
Amaryllis
(9,524 posts)Definitely a change of heart for him:
CNNs Wolf Blitzer on Wednesday hammered House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz over Donald Trumps potential conflicts of interest, at one point reminding the Republican leader that his responsibility is to serve as a check-and-balance for the president.
Chaffetz responded to a question about conflicts inherent in the presidents sprawling business empire by insisting, the president is exempt from conflicts of interest, so its kind of a non-issue, adding Trump has promised to wall
off his business interests while president.
What about the emolument clause of the U.S. Constitution, Blitzer asked, referring to a clause some Constitutional scholars interpret to mean Trump is forbidden from taking any money from a foreign state.
I know its surprising and frustrating to Democrats, but the president is exempt from these conflicts of interest, Chaffetz repeated.
But hes not exempt from the emoluments clause, is he? Blitzer pressed.
Chaffetz argued he refused to go on a fishing expedition that the Democrats want us to go into, adding the public understood what they were getting into when the overwhelmingly elected Trump into office.
Youre the chairman of this Oversight Committee thats looking at the executive branch of the U.S. government, Blitzer reminded Chaffetz, adding the President of the United States potentially could be in violation of the U.S. Constitution.
More:
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/watch-wolf-blitzer-batters-jason-chaffetz-for-refusing-to-investigate-trumps-conflicts-of-interest/
Raster
(20,998 posts)...will always check which way the wind is blowing before he moves... I seem to remember:
"I can no longer in good conscience endorse this person for president. It is some of the most abhorrent and offensive comments that you can possibly imagine. My wife and I, we have a 15-year-old daughter, and if I cant look her in the eye and tell her these things, I cant endorse this person."
Yeah, about that....
Stellar
(5,644 posts)Cha
(297,295 posts)DFW
(54,403 posts)She's well on her way to getting a strongly worded letter from Chaffetz. He might even slap her on the wrist if she persists with this illegal behavior. It's a good thing she was never a Democrat and never let Chaffetz see any of her emails, or she might be in for five years of hearings.
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)Or are you too busy with Benghazi?
mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)Did the chipmunk finally grow a set?