Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So the IRS will no longer check to see if people have insurance under the ACA (Original Post) Stinky The Clown Feb 2017 OP
It wont be viable, given the goal is to wipe out any Eliot Rosewater Feb 2017 #1
This seems to be eliminating enforcement of the tax penalty for not having insurance. Motown_Johnny Feb 2017 #2
The mandate is the lifeblood of the program Stinky The Clown Feb 2017 #3
+1. Unfortunately, a lot of people never understood. And many people who were critical of Obama Hoyt Feb 2017 #7
NPR story this afternoon Norbert9 Feb 2017 #4
This would have killed the ACA in the beginning... Freethinker65 Feb 2017 #5
That is terrible due to preexisting conditions... scscholar Feb 2017 #6

Eliot Rosewater

(31,121 posts)
1. It wont be viable, given the goal is to wipe out any
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 08:31 PM
Feb 2017

positive legacy of the first black president, no matter how many Americans have to be killed to do it.




I will sit here and tap my fingers and wait for citizens to become so fucking angry that something happens.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
2. This seems to be eliminating enforcement of the tax penalty for not having insurance.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 08:49 PM
Feb 2017

I'm not sure how big a deal that is.

It won't stop people from getting insurance if they want it. It will only allow people who don't want insurance to avoid the penalty.


I think most people want insurance and the penalty isn't their deciding factor.




Stinky The Clown

(67,819 posts)
3. The mandate is the lifeblood of the program
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 08:54 PM
Feb 2017

If people can avoid it, only sick people sign up. Costs go up and the whole system collapses.

It is a socialist program - one for all all for one.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
7. +1. Unfortunately, a lot of people never understood. And many people who were critical of Obama
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 09:22 PM
Feb 2017

are now seeing what life might be like without the ACA. Still hopeful enough GOPers will feel pressured to improve health coverage for all, but we are dangerously close to edge right now.

 

Norbert9

(494 posts)
4. NPR story this afternoon
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 09:02 PM
Feb 2017

About how the repubs proposed plans to tighten the enrollment periods in hopes of increasing the number of people covered would actually do just the opposite.

Freethinker65

(10,061 posts)
5. This would have killed the ACA in the beginning...
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 09:09 PM
Feb 2017

At the beginning if there was no penalty, many more healthy people and families would have hedged their bets and declined the insurance to "save" money upfront. Now that many of these people have seen the benefits of emergency coverage, preventative care, yearly physicals, contraception coverage, etc. for themselves, families, or others around them on the ACA, I would hope a majority would continue with the coverage. I was relying on the ACA being available to help bridge a gap I will have between my husband's retirement (our family is on his employee plan) and Medicare. I am sure I am not alone.
Killing the subsidies, another GOP idea, would be more likely to kill the ACA without even having to repeal it.

 

scscholar

(2,902 posts)
6. That is terrible due to preexisting conditions...
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 09:21 PM
Feb 2017

anyone could just not fairly pay into the system then just get insurance if they needed it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So the IRS will no longer...