Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yuiyoshida

(41,833 posts)
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 11:38 AM Feb 2017

Are you comfortable with the amount of Fox News Videos displayed on DU?

Seems like since the beginning of the Trump Administration there has been an increase of Fox News Video displayed on DU. We all know what that has done to America over the years, and how millions have been suckered into thinking they were real news...

Are you comfortable with the amount of Fox Videos displayed on DU?


16 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Time expired
Yes
4 (25%)
No
8 (50%)
I don't know
0 (0%)
I don't care.
3 (19%)
other (Explain)
1 (6%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are you comfortable with the amount of Fox News Videos displayed on DU? (Original Post) yuiyoshida Feb 2017 OP
I haven't noticed it underpants Feb 2017 #1
I haven't noticed. demmiblue Feb 2017 #2
It's not played unless you play it rock Feb 2017 #3
Fine, changed the wording to "displayed" yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #7
Well, I wasn't actually trying to get you to change it rock Feb 2017 #21
As long as it's in context I don't see what the problem is. TrekLuver Feb 2017 #4
Agreed - It's actually been fun to see Fox starting to attack Trump womanofthehills Feb 2017 #41
I'm not sure why...I guess because if it comes from FOX it's automatically bad...and I don't TrekLuver Feb 2017 #43
Faux news should be a banned site like Brietbart & Infowars. sarcasmo Feb 2017 #5
I have a violent reaction to Fox anything - projectile vomiting and nausea - so don't click NRaleighLiberal Feb 2017 #6
Where? I haven't noticed either. I think one fox clip posted did get my attention, BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2017 #8
Here is an example yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #10
Well, I didn't like towards the end, how one of the three blind mice slipped in the lie that NYT is BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2017 #15
I'm fine with it, but... Orrex Feb 2017 #9
You know that's not going to happen and those places won't remove it yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #11
100% correct Orrex Feb 2017 #12
:( BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2017 #17
But... pinboy3niner Feb 2017 #13
They should play that 24-7 on Fox yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #24
Other.... Wounded Bear Feb 2017 #14
I haven't noticed? I am bothered by links to the Daily Mail though Spider Jerusalem Feb 2017 #16
Maybe there should be a list yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #25
I'm only opposed to "RT" (RUSSIA TODAY) videos... NurseJackie Feb 2017 #18
Its unfortunate that Thom Hartmann yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #27
If you think a particular video is being posted as a right wing talking point Ms. Toad Feb 2017 #19
Good point but you have to leave it up to a jury yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #23
Then appeal it to the admins. Ms. Toad Feb 2017 #48
I have rarely seen the Admins over turn a Jury however yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #53
Thats because, generally, on issues other than bigotry Ms. Toad Feb 2017 #58
I am not sure I agree...the whole point of Democratic Underground yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #61
This. Agschmid Feb 2017 #26
Never noticed. femmocrat Feb 2017 #20
It's always been this way. What I know about Fox I have learned HERE at DU... Phentex Feb 2017 #22
There are clips all over Twitter and the Internet when they attack Trump. Maybe it encourages kerry-is-my-prez Feb 2017 #33
But here we should all be of one mind... yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #35
It doesn't bother me. Mz Pip Feb 2017 #28
This site already censors far too much. Motown_Johnny Feb 2017 #29
When they are beating up on Trump it's ok. Shep Smith and Chris Wallace have stuck their necks kerry-is-my-prez Feb 2017 #30
As long as they are labeled as such, why not ? rickford66 Feb 2017 #31
I like the ones that are mean to Trumpo bravenak Feb 2017 #32
I still wonder how much Fox News can yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #37
I think they know some news is coming about Trump that they cannot help him with bravenak Feb 2017 #40
I'd be wary of censoring or banning all right-wing media True Dough Feb 2017 #34
Exactly and that's fine... yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #39
I'm fine with it so long as it is being presented as supporting evidence of some sort... EarthFirst Feb 2017 #36
Here's a perfect example. True Dough Feb 2017 #38
If they are able to get access and record damning video when Ilsa Feb 2017 #42
I think that Fox News Corporate Heads thought they would be yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #44
If I know the link is Faux, I rarely open the thread, but old guy Feb 2017 #45
There IS some benefit to knowing what propaganda the opposition.... moriah Feb 2017 #46
I like it but yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #49
If it's a link to Faux, Breitbert, etc.. ? moriah Feb 2017 #62
oh yeah well, that would do it... yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #63
I am more concerned with context and content than having a knee-jerk reaction to source. Maru Kitteh Feb 2017 #47
agreed yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #50
+1 TubbersUK Feb 2017 #55
depends on the video and why JI7 Feb 2017 #51
I really don't mind if for example someone says... yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #56
burying our heads is not a means to his end Demonaut Feb 2017 #52
exactly yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #54
did you vote "no" because you think we need to see more or we should see less? Demonaut Feb 2017 #57
I generally voted no.... yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #60
freedom of speech and press MyMission Feb 2017 #59
I'm worried about the shitload of low count trolls Stinky The Clown Feb 2017 #64
Won't they eventually out themselves...? yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #65
Most will. Some survive. Stinky The Clown Feb 2017 #66
I don't see any Skittles Feb 2017 #67

rock

(13,218 posts)
21. Well, I wasn't actually trying to get you to change it
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 01:28 PM
Feb 2017

I was just making the point that the connection to the video is passive and if I don't click on it, it doesn't do anything. But I do appreciate your attention. Thanks!

 

TrekLuver

(2,573 posts)
43. I'm not sure why...I guess because if it comes from FOX it's automatically bad...and I don't
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:53 PM
Feb 2017

see it that way because here and there they are "truthful"...of course don't expect that from the Fox hacks..and they do have a lot of hacks employed over there. The Hacks drown out any serious news coverage and that's why they have this hack reputation...and it's well deserved.

NRaleighLiberal

(60,016 posts)
6. I have a violent reaction to Fox anything - projectile vomiting and nausea - so don't click
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 11:50 AM
Feb 2017

or watch.

But as for them being here - if posting or watching is what floats people's boats, go for it!

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
8. Where? I haven't noticed either. I think one fox clip posted did get my attention,
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 11:51 AM
Feb 2017

Because the headline was that one of their anchors reported on the lie-filled press conference, without spinning it into applause for Dolt45.

Something like that...I remember being surprised that there was a shred of honesty on Fux.

Otherwise, I'm not noticing anything being slipped other than to point out their phony garbage.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
15. Well, I didn't like towards the end, how one of the three blind mice slipped in the lie that NYT is
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 12:18 PM
Feb 2017

Fake and biased (unsaid--against the "real", "fair" outlets).

I didn't have a problem with Wallace's comments.

But that just now was about the most time I've ever spent watching Fux! I do know that propaganda media includes truthful commentary occasionally in order to obsfucate their actual trend.

Orrex

(63,217 posts)
9. I'm fine with it, but...
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 11:53 AM
Feb 2017

I could do without Fox News being broadcast at every doctor's office, restaurant, bar, generic waiting room and any other place with a tv, like my grocery store.

yuiyoshida

(41,833 posts)
11. You know that's not going to happen and those places won't remove it
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 11:54 AM
Feb 2017

but the question is why is it so important it must be allowed here.

Orrex

(63,217 posts)
12. 100% correct
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 11:58 AM
Feb 2017

When I've mentioned this in the past, people have (sincerely and in good faith) suggested that I ask the manager to change the station.

I live in a Trump-voting confederate-flag-toting rural PA county, where Fox News is accepted as gospel truth. Ain't no way a business is going to change the channel simply because some crybaby Liberal Snowflake like me needs a safe space.

yuiyoshida

(41,833 posts)
24. They should play that 24-7 on Fox
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:04 PM
Feb 2017

all the viewers brains would turn into mush...well more Mushyier than before! XD

yuiyoshida

(41,833 posts)
25. Maybe there should be a list
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:06 PM
Feb 2017

showing what to avoid and what not to avoid. Most of my links and news come from Asian sources. I love international news since Local and National news seems more contrived.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
18. I'm only opposed to "RT" (RUSSIA TODAY) videos...
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 12:28 PM
Feb 2017

... this site was being TOTALLY overrun by RT videos for a period of time.

It's unclear to me if those people who were previously posting them just decided to stop (voluntarily) or of there was some new rule that prohibited RT videos from being used.

yuiyoshida

(41,833 posts)
27. Its unfortunate that Thom Hartmann
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:09 PM
Feb 2017

is on RT...I would like to see him go elsewhere but there isn't really a decent liberal network any more,. not like Air America, I loved that. If I am not mistaken, Al Franklin, Rachel Maddow and Thom Hartmann were all there at some point.

Ms. Toad

(34,080 posts)
19. If you think a particular video is being posted as a right wing talking point
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 12:33 PM
Feb 2017

alert on it.

I'm not very fond of sticking my fingers in my ears and going "la-la-la-la I can't hear you" just because I see a news source I don't often agree with. If the content is a right wing talking point (without some poster-added explanation of why it is posted here), I'll alert on it.

yuiyoshida

(41,833 posts)
23. Good point but you have to leave it up to a jury
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 01:57 PM
Feb 2017

and we already know there are some who are on Juries who may vote the other way because they have an agenda here, to turn people to the Dark side..

Ms. Toad

(34,080 posts)
48. Then appeal it to the admins.
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 05:44 PM
Feb 2017

If they don't overturn the jury, then perhaps you have to ponder whether you're just too sensitive to having your world view disrupted.

(Note: The latter comment about sensitivity is NOT applicable to trash talk about minorities. On that, as far as I'm concerned, appeals ought to go to a jury of the targeted group - because, especially without being able to explain what it is I'm seeing it is pretty clear that the trasn-talk in coded words just isn't apparent to many good-hearted progressives who aren't part of the targeted group - AND the trash-talk is directed at people (many of whom are members here).) I give a lot more leeway to ideas than I do to attacks on identified groups.)

yuiyoshida

(41,833 posts)
53. I have rarely seen the Admins over turn a Jury however
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 05:54 PM
Feb 2017

many times a person, especially if he or she is a very low count person, will disappear for being a troll, which is good. We need that kind of "cleanup in aisle 6" kinda thing.

Ms. Toad

(34,080 posts)
58. Thats because, generally, on issues other than bigotry
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 06:02 PM
Feb 2017

directed at groups of people, juries get it right.

IMHO there are too many people who want to put blinders on to protect themselves from the significant variation in political thought among the left of center coalition. I've been called to quite a few juries for right wing talking points when the point being asserted wasn't even close.

We need to be exposed to the entire range of political thought (within the left-of-center perspective). (To be politically healthy, se actually do need to be exposed to the entire spectrum - but I'm fine with keeping the right wing thought out of this particular space.)

yuiyoshida

(41,833 posts)
61. I am not sure I agree...the whole point of Democratic Underground
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 08:15 PM
Feb 2017

Should be that its a safe haven for Democrats who can speak their minds, without people coming back with right wing talking points. Right now on the internet there are many places where if you say something, you will be trolled by a dozen Right wingers, including now a days Russian Trolls who will try to beat you to death with the stuff they are slinging. I Love how DU protects me from all the extreme Right wing crap, from people like Alex Jones and his followers. I don't need to be hit over the head over and over about some so called Red Flag event, that was placed over a real multiple shooting. Who WANTS THAT ANYWAY?

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
20. Never noticed.
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 12:42 PM
Feb 2017

I rarely click on videos because they play so slowly for me. I wish I could see rug's animal videos, but they are like slo-mo for me.

Phentex

(16,334 posts)
22. It's always been this way. What I know about Fox I have learned HERE at DU...
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 01:41 PM
Feb 2017

Somehow I never manage to accidentally change to that channel. I don't watch it to find out what the other side is saying. I don't know the hosts/show names etc except for what I see here at DU. But there are clearly many experts on everything Fox News here at DU.

kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
33. There are clips all over Twitter and the Internet when they attack Trump. Maybe it encourages
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:25 PM
Feb 2017

them to be a bit more anti-Trump? I've been seeing a lot of clips on various sites. Fox is also being threatened by the fascists.....

Mz Pip

(27,452 posts)
28. It doesn't bother me.
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:10 PM
Feb 2017

Ignorance is not bliss. I think we should be aware of what is going on in the opposition. We don't need to isolate ourselves.

If someone doesn't like it then they don't have to play it.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
29. This site already censors far too much.
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:12 PM
Feb 2017

If someone posts bullshit then we can call it out.

When factual posts are hidden because the facts are inconvenient, that is a problem.

We need more open discussion and less crazy talk about nullifying the election.








kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
30. When they are beating up on Trump it's ok. Shep Smith and Chris Wallace have stuck their necks
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:14 PM
Feb 2017

out. Let's hope that whoever is in charge there now will allow more criticism because we need to get to the few Fox watchers who might be reachable. If Fox starts to turn against Trump he could be screwed.

rickford66

(5,524 posts)
31. As long as they are labeled as such, why not ?
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:14 PM
Feb 2017

I don't have cable (never did) so this is the only way I can see how crazy they are. Do we want to put ourselves into the same kind of bubble as the FOX viewers ?

yuiyoshida

(41,833 posts)
37. I still wonder how much Fox News can
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:30 PM
Feb 2017

influence a Democrat or Liberal to slide to the "dark side". Its bad enough many of those idiots voted for Trump, do we have to have it here influencing people? I hope we have enough sense to call it BULLSHIT Mountain (Like Jon Stewart did).

True Dough

(17,313 posts)
34. I'd be wary of censoring or banning all right-wing media
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:26 PM
Feb 2017

One of the greatest longstanding concerns here is that the DU becomes an echo chamber. While nobody wants rogue accounts popping up and expressing sympathy for the crap spewed by Fox, Breitbart and Infowars, it's best that we at least remain aware of the spin they're attempting to put on events (and feel free to mock, disparage, and piss all over their hate-filled rants).

No love for those twits, but I also don't want to bury my head in the sand.

yuiyoshida

(41,833 posts)
39. Exactly and that's fine...
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:34 PM
Feb 2017

We have to remember Jon Stewart called it "BULLSHIT MOUNTAIN" and YES, IT SHOULD be viewed as much!

EarthFirst

(2,901 posts)
36. I'm fine with it so long as it is being presented as supporting evidence of some sort...
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:28 PM
Feb 2017

On edit: To clarify what I mean by supporting evidence: using it to support/document direct quotes pertaining to Republican policy/positions.

They are way more candid in their opinions with a network they feel is cozy to them, and this creates a two-edged blade which can be useful to direct our own message...

To utilize it as a straight source of news, no thanks!

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
42. If they are able to get access and record damning video when
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 02:52 PM
Feb 2017

Our favorite sources cannot, then I am fine with it. As long as it exposes trumplestiltskin, I'm fine.

yuiyoshida

(41,833 posts)
44. I think that Fox News Corporate Heads thought they would be
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 03:08 PM
Feb 2017

The President's Cheer Leader, but even they don't like him, and aren't cheering him on like they did for George W. Bush... stuff has changed there, yet.... they are still, again.. "BULLSHIT MOUNTAIN."

old guy

(3,283 posts)
45. If I know the link is Faux, I rarely open the thread, but
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 03:16 PM
Feb 2017

I do the same with Politico. I won't condemn others if they don't do as I do.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
46. There IS some benefit to knowing what propaganda the opposition....
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 03:29 PM
Feb 2017

.... is using, but maybe a trigger warning for those videos?

Maru Kitteh

(28,341 posts)
47. I am more concerned with context and content than having a knee-jerk reaction to source.
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 05:26 PM
Feb 2017

The very few Fox News videos I have seen were presented with appropriate context to make good points.

I would rather see a Fox News video presented here to make a useful and thoughtful point than some of the articles dragged over here from HuffPo and other places for the purpose of refighting the primaries, stirring old tensions or just general divisiveness.



JI7

(89,258 posts)
51. depends on the video and why
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 05:53 PM
Feb 2017

If it's some right wing crap they should have commentery to go with it.

yuiyoshida

(41,833 posts)
56. I really don't mind if for example someone says...
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 05:58 PM
Feb 2017

Here is an example of pure stupidity, and then show a video. As people said, context is important, its just, I don't want people turning to the "DARKSIDE" because of exposure. We all know that in many areas around the country, all they have is Rush Limbaugh on the radio and Fox News on the TV. Too much of that, and people change.

There was that story of the woman, whose father went from a liberal to a hard core Rightwinger by being exposed to Fox News over the years. I don't know how its done, but its worse than the JEDI MIND TRICK... seriously!!

Demonaut

(8,921 posts)
52. burying our heads is not a means to his end
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 05:53 PM
Feb 2017

we need to see the dysfunction

anyone who fall into that trap with sympathizing with the cheeto is NO liberal

yuiyoshida

(41,833 posts)
60. I generally voted no....
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 08:10 PM
Feb 2017

Because I really don't think we need the Fox News stuff unless its to show how fucked up People are on that side of the Aisle. I hate Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Dennis Miller, Karl Rove, Ben Stein, Greta Van Susteren and a bunch of others. Mostly when they open their mouths, crap comes out..

Jon Stewart said it best, calling it BULLSHIT MOUNTAIN!

MyMission

(1,850 posts)
59. freedom of speech and press
Sun Feb 19, 2017, 06:09 PM
Feb 2017

Should be respected, and I appreciate the links and info. Most is US here, including myself, don't and wouldn't read the fascist propaganda media options, but sometimes it helps to know what they're spewing. whether to show us their craziness so we can argue against and prove them wrong, or get inspired to fight their madness, I don't mind the links. I tend to ignore them anyway, but appreciate those who can spy in that arena.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are you comfortable with ...