General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLegal experts think Jeff Sessions is in a whole mess of trouble
VoxDuring his confirmation hearing, Attorney General Jeff Sessions testified, under oath, that I did not have communications with the Russians. We now know, thanks to the Washington Post, that this is false: Sessions met with the Russian ambassador to the US twice in the past year, when he was serving as both a Trump adviser and a US senator.
The million-dollar questions: Did Sessions break the law? And, if so, could he lose his job or even be charged with perjury like someone who lied in court? To find out, we reached out to several legal experts who study relevant topics. The general sense was that if Sessions didnt commit outright perjury, he came uncomfortably close.
I think a jury presented with evidence that he did have meetings with the Russians during the relevant time period could conclude that he perjured himself in front of the Senate committee, Stuart Green, a law professor at Rutgers who studies the law of lying, wrote via email.
Its very unlikely that Sessions will be prosecuted under laws criminalizing perjury, owing both to laws protecting sitting Congress members (which he was at the time of testimony) and due to the difficulty of proving a lie. But there already have been consequences for him: on Thursday afternoon, Sessions announced that he would be recusing himself from any future investigations into the Trump campaign and Russia. That might just be the beginning: a special prosecutor could be appointed, or, even worse, the Senate could begin something called contempt of Congress proceedings.
And the consequences could extend beyond Sessions potentially landing any Trump administration officials who helped him prepare his testimony in legal trouble.
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,013 posts)3catwoman3
(24,007 posts)Please, please, please!
wishstar
(5,270 posts)Makes no sense that he would have forgotten the meetings in his testimony and then never remembered the meetings later on to amend his testimony for accuracy, but now that he got exposed, he remembers that the meeting was gossipy and Ukraine came up but exact details he can't recall but it wasn't about Trump campaign even though one meeting was at the Repub convention.For the head lawyer of all lawyers in US, he is a mess of deliberate misinformation.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)KingBob
(150 posts)He answered a question that wasn't asked. He answered that he didn't talk to the Russians. Even if he was talking about "in the course of the campaign," he went to Cleveland not as a senator, but as a campaign member. He used campaign money in Cleveland, not Senate money.
Lock him up!
nycbos
(6,034 posts)That's what I find the most incredible thing about this.
I have several friends who are lawyers and they always say "you never answered any more then what was asked"
My uncle gave me an example. In this type of situation for someone the correct answer to "Do you know what time it is?" is "yes" not "6:17"
nycbos
(6,034 posts)All he had to do is say. "Yes i met with the ambassador on these occasions and this is what we discussed"
Now we have a new level of intrigue.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)mdbl
(4,973 posts)as usual with the repuglicans
triron
(22,007 posts)ailsagirl
(22,897 posts)http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/03/can-jeff-sessions-be-prosecuted-perjury
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/03/opinions/sessions-perjury-case-cevallos/
Needless to say, I hope they're wrong
dalton99a
(81,526 posts)Barring an extraordinary development, I'm afraid the GOP will not do anything to him, and there will not be a special prosecutor.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)It's frankly amazing how hypocritical they are. As long as they can cram their agenda through, they're perfectly fine with the Trump administration and its cabinet being Russian puppets. If Hillary were president, I can guarantee that we'd already be up to our eyeballs in investigations for all sorts of imaginary things.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)....as I understand it.
He's still in on lots of investigations that need to take place.
Such as the connections between 45 and Putin---over and above their effect on the elections. For instance, Russian 'garch money being given to 45 for bankruptcies, or for real estate that is essentially laundered money---all that is still under Sessions. So those investigations will probably not happen.
joet67
(624 posts)Nitram
(22,822 posts)It is a very specific charge, and depends on the question asked and the intent of the answer.