Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 08:10 PM Jun 2012

Why Chief Justice Roberts and not Scalia, Thomas, Alito, & Kennedy?

Tweety is discussing that right now. Chief Justice basically stated he went looking for a way to square the law with the Constitution. So he looked until he found it.

But why? Tweety ponders. He decides it's because Roberts was moral in his judgment and truly wanted to do something good and right for the country.

I have a different take. What is different about Roberts from the other conservatives on the S.Ct.? It's that he has YOUNG CHILDREN. He has a view of the country where he looks forward into the lives of his children, possibly. He can view the ACA from the viewpoint of parents who want to carry their college aged kids on their policies? He wants a country where his kids no longer have to foot the bill for tens of millions of citizens with no health care coverage? He wants a country where there is at least an attempt at health care cost control because it's run amuck? It's hard to say. But it's definitely a difference that he is the only conservative with young children, so it's hard to imagine that that didn't have something to do with it.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Chief Justice Roberts and not Scalia, Thomas, Alito, & Kennedy? (Original Post) Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 OP
It only took one. It gives the illusion of conflict. HopeHoops Jun 2012 #1
It serves the corporate masters. tblue Jun 2012 #2
Because Scalia, Thomas, Alito, & Kennedy Life Long Dem Jun 2012 #3
More jobs? That's a good thing. No, we didn't get single payer. But it's a step ... Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #4
He also is probably thinking about what history will say about ''The Robert's Court'' Tx4obama Jun 2012 #5
 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
1. It only took one. It gives the illusion of conflict.
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 08:17 PM
Jun 2012

They all had to have known it was wrong to overturn ACA.

tblue

(16,350 posts)
2. It serves the corporate masters.
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 08:25 PM
Jun 2012

The ACA has many facets, some of which are acceptable to the insurance industry and some that are less so. The division in thr SCOTUS reflects the bilateral nature of the bill.

You're giving Roberts way too much credit. He has voted on so many cases in ways that don't show any concern for the future of the country his children will inherit.

 

Life Long Dem

(8,582 posts)
3. Because Scalia, Thomas, Alito, & Kennedy
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 09:00 PM
Jun 2012

Knew it would be a win for the insurance industry.

http://it-jobs.fins.com/Articles/SBB0001424052702304058404577494530999215186/Jobs-in-Health-Care-to-Expand-with-Court-Ruling

Jobs in Health Care to Expand with Court Ruling

The U.S. Supreme Court's decision upholding "Obamacare" will have major implications for patients, insurers and hospitals. It will also determine the future of jobs in the health-care industry.

Upholding the federal health-care law, formally called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), as well as the mandate that everyone buy insurance could bring as many as 30 million new customers into the industry, causing significant uptick in both use and spending, said Linda J. Blumberg, senior fellow at The Urban Institute Health Policy Center.

More money will flow to "pharmaceutical companies, doctors, hospitals, the people they employ, and even insurers," said Joseph White, Luxenberg Family Professor of Public Policy and chair of the Department of Political Science at Case Western Reserve University.

Job growth will likely be strongest in the primary care and home care fields, said Joanne Spetz, a professor at the Institute for Health Policy Studies at the University of California, San Francisco. The demand for health-care workers like dietitians, social workers and hospital administrators will also increase.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
4. More jobs? That's a good thing. No, we didn't get single payer. But it's a step ...
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 09:10 PM
Jun 2012

it's a step in the right direction. Almost universal coverage. Not care..... coverage. There's a big difference, as we know.

But things this big are done in stages. This is a step toward single payer. It'll take activism, and it'd be too late for me...I'll be on Medicare by then. But it will be easier to go to single payer from this bridge that goes somewhere than from what existed beforehand.

But even if it doesn't, it helps millions of people. So it IS a good thing for them, and for the economy.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
5. He also is probably thinking about what history will say about ''The Robert's Court''
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 09:10 PM
Jun 2012

after all the Citizens United backlash he might be wanting to head off anymore damage to his name.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Chief Justice Roberts...