Lawrence is also "must see TV" these days!

They say perjury is hard to prove but I believe a good lawyer could convict on perjury. How can Sessions do his job as Attorney General with this cloud over his head?

Sessions has no business being our highest legal authority with legal issues hanging over his head. Not that it's a surprise, he's yet another one of Trump's "anti" appointments...

Hehehehehe.

??

It was cute

I thought there might have been a connection to Sessions or something else that I missed.

Anyone who puts out the GOP's racist, sexist, classist, antienvironmentalist edicts should automatically trigger a violation and major abuse of the First Amendment. Trump is way beyond impeachment, though; he should be in prison alongside Bush, Cheney, his entire "team," Mike Pence, and Ted Cruz.

in the latest Quinnipiac Poll.

I have yet to meet a Democrat who doesn't want this orange haired monster destroyed six ways to Sunday. And keep in mind there are FAR more of us than of them, judging by the popular vote in the US, along with the fact that every other country on the planet OVERWHELMINGLY hate Trump. But that's not the point. The point is we are screwed until we get the majority again. Hopefully the courts can help us get some wins prior to 2018, particularly in allowing immigrants to vote.

There are at least three reasons, but suffice to say that he has committed several violations that warrant such a criminal sanction.

That's my second favorite "opinion" of Trump. My favorite opinion is not something I would care to publicize.

I personally know a number of Republicans that didn't vote for him and can't stand him. Mostly women. However these people were Charlie Baker Republicans and not the rabid, religious, hateful Republicans that tend to support Trump. But I also know a few Republican men that can't stand him either. They think he's an absolute idiot and an embarrassment to the party.

It requires a 2/3 threshhold in the Senate to fully oust the president, but he is still impeached. If the GOP can refer to Clinton as an impeached president for deeds that are dwarfed by Trump's Russian association in heisting the presidency, then we don't live in a country of law anymore.

1) O Donnell was talking about the 25th amendment not impeachment, which would be carried out by the cabinet and only appealed to Congress.

2) a lot of people are advocating an early impeachment and this is a terrible idea as it will make it a commonplace. Impeachment must be held to such a high standard that it meets "high crimes etc." and not a political reversal of an election. If it is the latter then it can be used against us as well.

"Impeachment" is probably the most mis-used word when it comes to political actions. Most people (particularly Repugs) think that impeachment itself is the entire act of removing a disgraced politician from office, when it is merely a component of it. In fact it is a simple component, but it is used more for political show of force.

(I would recommend that anytime the president is a Republican, and the House is majority Democrat, that they ALWAYS impeach the president as a matter of rule, not as an exception, because Republican policies are anti-humanist. Such an impeachment would secure the House member's reputation with his/her/hir progressive base, and make it unlikely that a GOP ingrate can ever be elected in that district again. But I digress.)

The 25th Amendment, though, would require a consensus upon people whom, ostensibly, are closest to the president in the first place, which means they aren't normal people, but crazed fanatics of their own right. Fat chance seeing any of those reprobates even considering a presidential eject button.

it was mostly the disregard and disrespect for the Constitution and the oath to defend it.

He should have been impeached after the first week.