Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

shraby

(21,946 posts)
1. Suppose she talked via skype or other means to Christopher Steele?
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 03:43 PM
Mar 2017

She said last night, it's up to the media to get the information for us because congress doesn't show any inclination on the republican side of the investigation to talk to Steele, and they run the show.

Satch59

(1,353 posts)
2. I think she's ready to spill some good stuff
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 03:46 PM
Mar 2017

Every night lately has opened with a Russia connection and last night she said the dossier shows definite collusion so is she ready to put her reputation on the line and declare collusion or does MSNBC have to also be onboard?

I would trust her...

shraby

(21,946 posts)
3. MSNBC must be on board. They are advertising it with a count-down clock.
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 03:49 PM
Mar 2017

Looks like she's going for the gold.

Justice

(7,188 posts)
10. I believe Rachel will get an interview with Steele
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 05:26 PM
Mar 2017

At some point. Perhaps after Schiff talks to him.

She is putting pieces together.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TRMS - MSNBC - The Russia...