Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
3. That was my first thought...
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 04:23 PM
Mar 2017

If there's any truth at all to the wiretapping, a judge okayed wiretapping Trump or someone he was talking to.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
9. He was referring to the NYT article of January 19th, and the "wiretapped communication" comment...
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 05:20 PM
Mar 2017
One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House.


Of course the headline explains what communications:
Intercepted Russian Communications Part of Inquiry Into Trump Associates

Vinca

(50,285 posts)
2. The only way anyone in Trump Tower was tapped was if intelligence agencies got a warrant to do it,
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 04:22 PM
Mar 2017

which means Dear Leader is guilty of something, or if they unexpectedly picked up communications with someone at Trump Tower while monitoring a foreign entity. The idea that Obama had anything to do with it is ludicrous.

Johonny

(20,856 posts)
5. Some truth, that's a rather qualified term.
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 04:30 PM
Mar 2017

some truth is a lot like saying, the total statement was not true.

Ari Fleischer is a shill that smokes crack. There's some truth in that statement, but the statement isn't true...probably.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
7. If you hold your mouth just right, and squint just so . . .
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 04:36 PM
Mar 2017

Ari: I call bullshit. President Trump specifically said that Obama tapped his phones. There were no qualifiers, no distancers, it was Obama and Obama alone who tapped Trump's phones (plural, not singular). If Trump has proof of this, it's up to him to bring it to the table, not for everyone else to figure out which of his myriad hobgoblins was whispering in his ear when he sent out his tweets. There's no "some truth" to this beyond there is a man named Obama and Trump possesses phones.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
8. What he did was reference the NYT article as 'a basis of truth' (more like a misguided notion)...
Wed Mar 8, 2017, 05:18 PM
Mar 2017
Intercepted Russian Communications Part of Inquiry Into Trump Associates


But what he failed to mention, as did Levin, was the HEADLINE explains the source of the wiretaps referred to in the article!! NOT Louise Mensch's report about a FISA 'warrant'.


One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House.



It was Russian communications that were wiretapped, not trump's!


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html?_r=0
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»m$nbc: ari fleischer.......