General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Deep State Is a Figment of Steve Bannons Imagination
By LOREN DEJONGE SCHULMAN at Politico
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/the-deep-state-is-a-figment-of-steve-bannons-imagination-214892
"SNIP...........
To Steve Bannon and his colleagues in the White House, the Deep State is an adversary to be destroyed. In recent remarks, the presidents chief strategist called for the deconstruction of the administrative state. According to the Washington Post, hes been whispering in President Trumps ear about the Deep States alleged campaign to ruin him. And, truth be told, charged with leaking for its own purposes, thwarting Trumps policy priorities and ousting his appointees, this Deep State sure looks quite guilty in the context of a chaotic first six weeks in office.
Its far easier to blame shadowy bureaucrats than to take responsibility for your own failures.
But its far easier to blame shadowy bureaucrats than to take responsibility for your own failures. The presidents executive order on terrorism didnt fail because the Deep State sabotaged it; it failed because an insular White House did not seek or heed its advice. Leaks did not bring down former national security adviser Michael Flynn; his deception of Vice President Mike Pence did. Though it is impossible to know, much of the exposure of White House infighting that so angers Trump seems far more likely to be coming from his senior aides than from low-level bureaucrats.
None of which is to say that Bannons view of the world is completely baseless. Bureaucracies have institutional interests they are loath to let go of, and are plagued by an inertia resistant to disruption. This is common to all large organizations, not a flaw unique to the U.S. system of government. But Trump has a tool to manage this dynamic that he has inexplicably chosen not to wield: placement of around 4,000 political appointees throughout the bureaucracy. Inserting his personal emissaries throughout the Deep State would give him far more political control over the civil servants he perceives to be rebelling, and at the same time give his team better access to their expertise. But not a single one has been confirmed below
And heres where Bannons blame game breaks down: Past presidents have learned there are limits to what a pen and a phone (or a tweet) can implement without calling on the resources of the administrative state. This is not a threat but a fact. Their oath is to the Constitution, not the president, but they are effectively there to make him look good. And he has no alternative: There is no substitute state to defeat ISIS, renegotiate trade deals, build walls, round up illegal immigrants or catch terrorists if Trump works to dismantle the national security bureaucracy. Making the Deep State an enemy will cripple his administration.
.............SNIP"
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)truly believe this garbage. Bannon and Trump are making a ton of bucks promoting these false stories.
BlueStateLib
(937 posts)http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/02/27/glaude_deconstruction_administrative_state_is_shorthand_for_dismantling_the_new_deal.html