Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts) Mon Mar 13, 2017, 03:30 PM Mar 2017

"If hes not joking": Sean Spicer loses it when NBC reporter asks "when can we trust the president?"

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/if-hes-not-joking-sean-spicer-loses-it-when-nbc-reporter-asks-when-can-we-trust-the-president/

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"If hes not joking": Sean Spicer loses it when NBC reporter asks "when can we trust the president?" (Original Post) Miles Archer Mar 2017 OP

Great bit, thank you. Spicer misses the point of how believe someone giving contradictory opinions uppityperson Mar 2017 #1

All of this tip-toeing around what he really wants to say, progressoid Mar 2017 #2

They were off by more than half because of Republican obstructionism not because their predictor JTFrog Mar 2017 #3

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)

1. Great bit, thank you. Spicer misses the point of how believe someone giving contradictory opinions

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Mon Mar 13, 2017, 03:39 PM

Mar 2017

progressoid

(49,992 posts)

2. All of this tip-toeing around what he really wants to say,

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Mon Mar 13, 2017, 04:18 PM

Mar 2017

the president is a fucking liar!

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)

3. They were off by more than half because of Republican obstructionism not because their predictor

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Mon Mar 13, 2017, 04:24 PM

Mar 2017

model was wrong. Obstructionism and fake news of death panels and all of their bullshit.

No one really ever takes into account how much Republicans want poor people and minorities to die.

Reply to this discussion