General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums24 Democrats voted against the privileged resolution scolding Darrell Issa
Shame on them all, shame on them.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/29/congressional-black-caucus-darrell-issa_n_1637626.html?utm_hp_ref=politics&utm_hp_ref=politics
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)I'd like to see the list.
Greybnk48
(10,177 posts)I never saw one posted but I really want to know who stood with Issa. This had nothing to do with the gun lobby, so no lame excuses.
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)and a couple of members of the CBC.
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2012/roll443.xml
FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 443
H RES 718 YEA-AND-NAY 29-Jun-2012 10:35 AM
QUESTION: On Motion to Table
BILL TITLE: Raising a question of the privileges of the House
Yeas Nays NV
235 ---- 06 Republican
024 161 06 Democratic
259 161 12 TOTALS
Democrats voting "AYE":
Altmire
Barrow
Boren
Boswell
Cardoza
Chandler
Costa
Critz
Donnelly (IN)
Hochul
Kind
Kissell
Kucinich
Matheson
McIntyre
Michaud
Owens
Peterson
Ross (AR)
Schrader
Scott (VA)
Shuler
Walz (MN)
Watt
DainBramaged
(39,191 posts)I had little respect before, now I have none. He can't leave fast enough.
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)wasting precious legislative time on the Issa outrage.
The vote was a "motion to table" Sheila Jackson-Lee's condemnation of Issa. It took place on a Friday morning with time running out before a Fourth of July recess.
A motion to table kills debate, instantly. Had hours been wasted on Issa, IMO the House might not have been able to approve the Transportation Conference Report, which approved 3 million construction jobs and prevented a student loan rate hike on Monday.
This is the only explanation that makes sense to me for the votes of Kucinich, Bobby Scott of Virginia, and Mel Watt of NC.
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)for Holder's contempt citation Thursday (all but Rahall of WV).
See the earlier GD thread at http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002872913 .
The NY Times printed a great graphic for those 17, at URL http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/112/house/2/441 .
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)I hadn't noticed that the URL is fixed except for the last number field, which is the House Clerk's roll-call number for the vote.
I just got the link on the contempt vote Thursday, from highplainsdem at http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=872988 .
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)Where is House leadership in all this, one has to wonder?
PB