Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Could Nancy Pelosi be our next president? (Original Post) Hamlette Mar 2017 OP
if the President and VP were removed, Ryan would become the President for the remaining still_one Mar 2017 #1
Unless they remain until after midterms and we take then house... Lucinda Mar 2017 #13
ok, I got it. Yes, in that case she would be next in line still_one Mar 2017 #21
She's never shown any inclination, & she's brilliant where she is. Also, she's one of the RW's .... Hekate Mar 2017 #2
which makes her brillian as a president....LBJ style Hamlette Mar 2017 #16
I like Nancy but colbertforpresident Mar 2017 #3
Tainted by whom? murielm99 Mar 2017 #6
Of course not colbertforpresident Mar 2017 #30
You do realize that she wins her district murielm99 Mar 2017 #33
It's not just what the right says. colbertforpresident Mar 2017 #34
She is not running for President. murielm99 Mar 2017 #35
Fuck the right and to hell with their opinion on anything. milestogo Mar 2017 #36
Tainted? mcar Mar 2017 #31
Could be sooner than that, theoretically DefenseLawyer Mar 2017 #4
she'll be 78 in two years librechik Mar 2017 #5
So, she's about Bernie Sanders' age frazzled Mar 2017 #10
if she runs, I'll vote for her librechik Mar 2017 #23
I don't think the OP was referring to her running frazzled Mar 2017 #24
Not exactly. drray23 Mar 2017 #28
If the election is annulled, would Joe Biden become the interim President? L. Coyote Mar 2017 #7
Sigh. There is simply no provision for nullifying an election. PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2017 #8
There are rights in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Courts uphold our rights. L. Coyote Mar 2017 #9
There's simply no provision for election annulment. For one, we don't have a single Presidential Warren DeMontague Mar 2017 #11
At the risk of repeating myeself, PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2017 #12
I posted this awhile back. so have others: impeach both, after the Gabi Hayes Mar 2017 #14
I know. It's silly. Warren DeMontague Mar 2017 #18
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2017 #15
I like the sound of "Speaker Pelosi" Warren DeMontague Mar 2017 #17
Oh my. aikoaiko Mar 2017 #19
Make it so. pressbox69 Mar 2017 #20
theoretically yes, realistically, virtually no chance onenote Mar 2017 #22
I don't know Sgent Mar 2017 #25
6 months after the 2018 elections, the 2020 Democratic nominees HoneyBadger Mar 2017 #26
if trump and pence removed in 2019 and democrats regain congress and then yes beachbum bob Mar 2017 #27
I doubt it. liquid diamond Mar 2017 #29
Could she? Anything is possible. *** Would she? I think not. NurseJackie Mar 2017 #32

still_one

(92,435 posts)
1. if the President and VP were removed, Ryan would become the President for the remaining
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 11:25 PM
Mar 2017

term of the existing president. If in 2018 the Democrats take the House the best Nancy Pelosi could hope for is the Speaker of the House

Hekate

(90,849 posts)
2. She's never shown any inclination, & she's brilliant where she is. Also, she's one of the RW's ....
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 11:25 PM
Mar 2017

...favorite boogie men, and often comes up for criticism on the Left. Or at least some of the Left at DU, don't ask me why. Perhaps because instead of magically forcing the entire progressive wish list thru the House, she counts votes and know what will pass and what won't.

Hamlette

(15,412 posts)
16. which makes her brillian as a president....LBJ style
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 02:42 AM
Mar 2017

Pelosi is the best speaker this country has seen in years. She can get the votes she needs. No, she's not charismatic or warm and fuzzy so she couldn't win a national election but LBJ was (except Vietnam) one of the most consequential presidents ever. Had it not been for Vietnam we'd have him up there with FDR. His list of accomplishments in the war on poverty and civil rights is astonishingly impressive. LBJ did it because he could whip the Senate from his many years there. The called him the Master of the Senate. She's most certainly the Master of the House.

I tell ya, it could work and is my favorite day dream of the week.

30. Of course not
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 12:29 PM
Mar 2017

But she has become the bogeyman for the right. Too many on the left won't support her because of the damage done by rightwing media. In other words they have created doubt about her in the minds of many Americans through their fake news.

murielm99

(30,776 posts)
33. You do realize that she wins her district
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 03:02 PM
Mar 2017

by huge landslides?

I don't care what the right wing says about her. I am get very tired of worrying about what the far left says. How many times do they get to screw over this party?

34. It's not just what the right says.
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 06:51 PM
Mar 2017

It's the perceived image. Many of the undecideds have heard the propaganda about her. Many believe it. We need a candidate that can win. I'm not sure that she can. I doubt that she would run.

murielm99

(30,776 posts)
35. She is not running for President.
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 07:36 PM
Mar 2017

And she has no need to fear the BS that is spewed.

We need someone younger, from the South or Midwest.

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
4. Could be sooner than that, theoretically
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 11:31 PM
Mar 2017

If the Freedom Caucus crowd (backed by Trump) tries to force Ryan out, and the Republicans engage in open civil war as a result, it could split the vote among Republicans for a successor and the united Democrats could elect the speaker. I don't really think that could happen, but it is theoretically possible.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
10. So, she's about Bernie Sanders' age
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 01:03 AM
Mar 2017

He'll be 77 in two years. (But since women live longer, and she appears to be in great shape, we'll given them an even on that, okay?). Most people here had no problem with that. Is there something different about a woman being past 75 and a man being past 75? Curious minds want to know.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
24. I don't think the OP was referring to her running
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 10:12 AM
Mar 2017

I think it's a line of succession thing. Pretty far-fetched, but could happen if: (1) Trump is impeached or resigns, leaving Pence prexy; (2) The Democrats take leadership of the House in 2018; and (3) Pence is impeached or resigns. Pelosi would then become the president automatically.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,908 posts)
8. Sigh. There is simply no provision for nullifying an election.
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 12:47 AM
Mar 2017

As for Pelosi, I'm not at all fond of her, but it would be somewhat amusing if things could play out with Dems taking the House in 2018 and somehow both Trump and Pence get removed and she become President. Sort of a fork in the eyes of all the Republicans.

My problem with her is that she's far too "establishment" and has gone along with Republican agendas far too easily, rather than consistently sticking up for real Democratic/progressive values.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
9. There are rights in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Courts uphold our rights.
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 12:54 AM
Mar 2017

http://constitutionus.com/

https://www.billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/bill-of-rights/

Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


We have the right to representative government, duly elected, without criminal interference.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
11. There's simply no provision for election annulment. For one, we don't have a single Presidential
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 01:06 AM
Mar 2017

election, we have 50 separate ones.

The electoral college has spoken.

The constitutional remedy is impeachment.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,908 posts)
12. At the risk of repeating myeself,
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 01:51 AM
Mar 2017

there is NO provision in the Constitution to nullify the election. There's nothing in any of it about a right to a duly elected representative government.

Please reread it.

 

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)
14. I posted this awhile back. so have others: impeach both, after the
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 01:56 AM
Mar 2017

2018 election, when the newly elected dem house/senate take office

whoever is speaker at the time becomes president. could be pelosi

doesn't even have to be a sitting member of congress, right?

KGOPers are talking Gingrich right now

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
18. I know. It's silly.
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 02:47 AM
Mar 2017

Not to mention the terrible precedent of junking the constitution "because its an emergency"

I can think of a lot of situations where that precedent could come back and bite us on the ass.

Better to stick with the Constituion.

Response to Hamlette (Original post)

onenote

(42,779 posts)
22. theoretically yes, realistically, virtually no chance
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 07:47 AM
Mar 2017

There is no realistic scenario in which Trump and Pence are removed from office simultaneously. No matter what happens in November 2018, it is simply not realistic to envision a situation where 2/3 of the Senate would vote to convict both simultaneously. Each would get their own impeachment trial and they wouldn't run concurrently. If Trump were ousted first, Pence would immediately succeed to the presidency and there would be a vote to fill the VP vacancy. I don't see a realistic scenario where Pelosi is that person. If Pence is ousted first, same thing.

Plus, the most realistic scenario is that if there is any real likelihood of one or the other being removed from office, a deal will be involving resignation of one or both with someone brought in to be a caretaker president.

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
25. I don't know
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 10:41 AM
Mar 2017

if we retake the house in '18, we could just pull a Garland and refuse to confirm Pence's replacement as VP....

 

HoneyBadger

(2,297 posts)
26. 6 months after the 2018 elections, the 2020 Democratic nominees
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 10:56 AM
Mar 2017

Will be campaigning. They will not want this to muddy the waters

 

liquid diamond

(1,917 posts)
29. I doubt it.
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 12:29 PM
Mar 2017

She is a woman. She's in her 70's. She is hated by the alt-left and alt-right. She has acquired some baggage (as all politicians have) over her career. I'm not an ageist, but those are the reasons (except being a woman) why we need a young candidate.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
32. Could she? Anything is possible. *** Would she? I think not.
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 01:12 PM
Mar 2017

I'll hate to see her go, but I imagine she's likely to retire soon.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could Nancy Pelosi be our...