Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,832 posts)
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 07:42 PM Mar 2017

Meet the man who may end gerrymandering: A retired Wisconsin law professors Supreme Court case coul

Meet the man who may end gerrymandering: A retired Wisconsin law professor’s Supreme Court case could save democracy

by David Daley at Salon

http://www.salon.com/2017/03/26/meet-the-man-who-may-end-gerrymandering-a-retired-wisconsin-law-professors-supreme-court-case-could-save-democracy/

"SNIP..............


The case with the most promise to deliver a lasting judicial remedy is Whitford v. Gill, from Wisconsin, which advances a fascinating standard called the “efficiency gap.” It is the brainchild of law professor Nicholas Stephanopoulos and political scientist Eric McGhee, but has an elegant simplicity that is easily understandable outside of academia. If gerrymandering is the dark art of wasting the other party’s votes – either by “packing” them into as few districts as possible, or “cracking” them into sizable minorities in many seats – the efficiency gap compares wasted votes that do not contribute to victory.

In November, a panel of federal judges smiled upon this standard and ruled that the state assembly districts drawn by a Republican legislature in the Whitford case represented an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. “Although Wisconsin’s natural political geography plays some role in the apportionment process, it simply does not explain adequately the sizable disparate” advantage held by Republicans under these new maps, wrote the court.

The judges ordered new state assembly maps in time for the 2018 election – a big deal, considering these district lines have helped give Republicans their largest legislative majorities in several decades, despite years in which Democratic candidates receive more votes. But just as important, it accepted the “efficiency gap” rationale and sent it toward Justice Kennedy. If Kennedy finds it workable, it would become much more difficult for politicians to choose their own voters and rig maps in their favor.

If this case makes history, it will be thanks to the commitment of lawyers and political scientists, but also to the Wisconsin citizens who launched it, starting with regular meetings at a Madison tea room. The plaintiff whose name could become synonymous with taming the gerrymander and restoring fairness and competitiveness to our elections is a retired law professor named Bill Whitford. We sat down at a redistricting conference at Duke University this month to discuss his case, the efficiency gap and all the luck it has required along the way

.................SNIP"

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Meet the man who may end gerrymandering: A retired Wisconsin law professors Supreme Court case coul (Original Post) applegrove Mar 2017 OP
And give Wisconsin an extra 7 years for the ones you stole from us. milestogo Mar 2017 #1
better get this done while SCOTUS is 4 - 4. before Gorsuch is seated nt msongs Mar 2017 #2
maybe if at least oral arguments can be heard soon enough Stargleamer Mar 2017 #7
Gerrymandering can favor Democrats as well as Republicans milestogo Mar 2017 #8
That map means there will be very few Hispanic politicians in the Midwest. AngryAmish Mar 2017 #3
Here's the wiki background: lindysalsagal Mar 2017 #4
Correct me if wrong: Each state will have to serve a similar suit in order to lindysalsagal Mar 2017 #5
This is good.... Jim Beard Mar 2017 #6
Today in 1812, the original Gerrymander map was published Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2017 #9

Stargleamer

(1,992 posts)
7. maybe if at least oral arguments can be heard soon enough
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 08:29 PM
Mar 2017

it will become too late for Gorsuch to wreck things.

milestogo

(16,829 posts)
8. Gerrymandering can favor Democrats as well as Republicans
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 08:32 PM
Mar 2017

Schwarzenegger complained about it in California.

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
3. That map means there will be very few Hispanic politicians in the Midwest.
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 07:58 PM
Mar 2017

Very spread out. White people generally do not despise Hispanic folks like black folks, and will allow them to live on the periferary of white towns and suburbs.

lindysalsagal

(20,746 posts)
4. Here's the wiki background:
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 08:05 PM
Mar 2017
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitford_v._Gill

Whitford v Gill is a United States court case regarding unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering.

On July 8, 2015, the case was filed with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin arguing that Wisconsin’s 2011 state assembly map was unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering favoring the Republican-controlled legislature which discriminated against Democratic voters.[1] The plaintiff argues that the map violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection.[2]

In 2016, a three-judge federal panel allowed the case to proceed to trial, the first time a case regarding gerrymandering has proceeded in three decades. On November 21, 2016, a 2-1 decision declared that the map was unconstitutional. The panel deferred its ruling on the remedy which was handed down on January 27, 2017.[3]

To assess the validity of the map, the panel assessed: “(1) [was] intended to place a severe impediment on the effectiveness of the votes of individual citizens on the basis of their political affiliation, (2) has that effect, and (3) cannot be justified on other, legitimate legislative grounds.”[4]

lindysalsagal

(20,746 posts)
5. Correct me if wrong: Each state will have to serve a similar suit in order to
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 08:07 PM
Mar 2017

change their state? And they'll have to either win at the local court or have it make it to the scotus?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Meet the man who may end ...