Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:23 AM Jul 2012

NYT: Mittens may have raised $100 million in June (will unleash negative ads on Obama)

New York Times: "People close to the Romney campaign say it could close its June fund-raising books having collected an additional $100 million, possibly more, a tally that would exceed all expectations and further extend the overall Republican financial advantage in the race."

"With that cash influx, Mr. Romney's team is preparing a new advertising campaign that will aggressively portray Mr. Obama as a craven political figure, rather than the transformative leader he pledged to be."

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/07/01/romney_may_have_raised_100_million_in_june.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT: Mittens may have raised $100 million in June (will unleash negative ads on Obama) (Original Post) WI_DEM Jul 2012 OP
They may max out too soon. BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #1
Mitt's in London fundraising, hosted by Barclay CEO ... ananda Jul 2012 #4
Challenge yourself fredamae Jul 2012 #2
The one they're running nonstop in Ohio: "The private sector is doing fine..." rucky Jul 2012 #3
Im not sure I understand that attack anyway. DCBob Jul 2012 #5
Running it in NC nonstop to the point it sounds stupid... nc4bo Jul 2012 #6
i dont see any Romney ads. But Im in LA GusFring Jul 2012 #7

BumRushDaShow

(129,559 posts)
1. They may max out too soon.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:27 AM
Jul 2012

Individuals can only give up to $2500 if the above fund-raising is referencing "individuals" (including the bundling of individuals) vs PACs.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
2. Challenge yourself
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:36 AM
Jul 2012

to not watch nor hear them-Mute buttons or disconnecting from providers are our best weapon.
If we refuse the exposure they've wasted their money. I want them to spend, spend Big-spend it All and get the same return on their investments as they've given us for ours. NOTHING
They've Spent our tax dollar contributions Unwisely without our consent. Our money was spent on tax-cuts for the uber wealthy, wars & undeserving bank bailouts etc then promise cuts on progs intended to receive tax dollar funding.
ENOUGH.
We already know the message-We already know the lies-so Why "go there"?
Shut them Down. Vote 'em out and prove Money-Big Money has No Voice with which to Speak.

rucky

(35,211 posts)
3. The one they're running nonstop in Ohio: "The private sector is doing fine..."
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:39 AM
Jul 2012

yeah, they quote Obama out of context and spin it around, but the quote on it's own isn't that damaging.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
5. Im not sure I understand that attack anyway.
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:13 AM
Jul 2012

The private sector is doing fine. Their profits are up, their stocks are up, they are starting to hire again. Sure there are problems but in comparison to 3 years ago they are doing fantastic!

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
6. Running it in NC nonstop to the point it sounds stupid...
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 11:18 AM
Jul 2012

Also with slighty different wording, different voice overs and graphics.

The more you hear it, the dumber and more monotonous it sounds. Reminds me of a nagging little kid who keeps asking why why why why...

A real turn off.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT: Mittens may have ra...