Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere's No Economic Justice Without Abortion Rights
Some men in the Democratic party seem to think a strong defense of reproductive rights is optional.
On Wednesday's Morning Joe, Vermont senator Bernie Sanders went on to talk about working with Donald Trump and the future of the Democratic Party. Host Joe Scarborough brought up the question of abortion and other "social issues" that he said kept white working-class voters voting Republican in states like West Virginia, where they would gain more economic benefits if Democrats were in charge. He suggested that if Democrats want to win white working-class voters in states like Kentucky, they might need to run candidates who reflect the social values of those same white working-class voters - that is, opposing a woman's legal right to decide for herself whether to carry a pregnancy to term. Could Democrats, Scarborough asked Sanders, "be open to candidates that may not be rigidly pro-choice, may not be rigidly pro gun control?" Sanders said yes.
A few days earlier, a column appeared in the New York Times encouraging Democrats to moderate their abortion stance. The writer, a male theology professor, implored Democrats to tamp down their opposition to the Hyde Amendment, which bars federal Medicaid funds for paying for most abortions - making the procedure harder to get for poor women - and treat abortion as "an issue of profound moral and religious concern."
Some men, it seems, think moving right on women's rights will allow the party to secure more votes and give it space to move left on economic issues.
This is a terrible strategy. It demonstrates the limits of "economic populism" when the term is defined by only men. And it's exactly why feminists have been so worried about the backlash against "identity politics" and the obsession from both the right and left with white working-class men. In the aftermath of Hillary Clinton's loss, a cottage industry of "I-told-you-so" men has sprung up to lecture feminists and racial justice advocates on how identity isn't enough to win elections. Many of these same political analysts (and men who play political analysts on Twitter) have an outsize reverence for the white working-class man and seem to think that leftist economic policies will get these conservatives voters to change their long-standing right-wing politics -- if Democrats just abandon the "identity politics" of pushing issues related to race and gender.
Of course, when "identity politics" are demonized in an effort to appeal to white men, it's women and minorities who lose out.
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/a9203970/democrats-abortion-economic-justice/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 2420 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There's No Economic Justice Without Abortion Rights (Original Post)
ehrnst
Mar 2017
OP
RedWedge
(618 posts)1. Sanders needs to stay in his lane.
Democrats have been doing exactly what he calls for FOR DECADES at all levels. Pretending that he's got this great new idea that will save the party is disingenuous.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)2. Going backward socially is not "revolution." (nt)
RedWedge
(618 posts)3. You said it better than I did.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)4. I didn't come up with that. I've seen it posted too often
But thanks.
leftstreet
(36,112 posts)5. FUCK those voters!
Why do Democrats keep wringing their hands over how to get these psychos to the polls?
Fuck them! Ignore them!
Focus on the eligible voting population that DOESN'T VOTE
Wounded Bear
(58,706 posts)6. I agree...