Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,010 posts)
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:24 PM Apr 2017

Watch out for this sneaky 50 percent retirement fee

I hope most people know about this penalty. If your financial advisor doesn't let you know fire his ass and get a new one.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________

You actually can’t leave your retirement funds untouched forever — the IRS has made sure of that.

And if you’re still holding onto your retirement savings in your 70s, you could get slapped with a painful tax bill.

Once you turn 70½, you are required to begin taking the required minimum distribution from your retirement accounts — or face a 50% tax penalty.

For the oldest Boomers in the U.S. today, who turned 70 last year, time is running out.

http://www.king5.com/money/magnify-money/watch-out-for-this-sneaky-50-percent-retirement-fee/426589627

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Watch out for this sneaky 50 percent retirement fee (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2017 OP
We have it taken out and sent to us every year. shraby Apr 2017 #1
is it sneaky? eniwetok Apr 2017 #2
How is this sneaky? SharonClark Apr 2017 #3
It isn't sneaky at all. This has been in place for a long time at 70.5, and most plans alert you still_one Apr 2017 #4
What is sneaky about it I have known about it for years? An IRA is a tax defered doc03 Apr 2017 #5
Money intended for retirement is supposed to be used for Progressive dog Apr 2017 #6
I'm 66 and take distributions from my IRA each year central scrutinizer Apr 2017 #7
This is not sneaky, or even news. Ms. Toad Apr 2017 #8
Pretty bad headline - using 'sneaky' for something well-known and open. The Treasury does moonscape Apr 2017 #9
As others have already pointed out, PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2017 #10

eniwetok

(1,629 posts)
2. is it sneaky?
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:39 PM
Apr 2017

After all the ONLY reason people are given tax breaks on the IRA contributions is because it's for retirement!

But it's good to remind people about the terms of IRAs that might have been set up 35 years ago.

still_one

(92,209 posts)
4. It isn't sneaky at all. This has been in place for a long time at 70.5, and most plans alert you
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 10:52 PM
Apr 2017

that when you reach 70.5 you have to start taking MRD.

This applies to deductible IRA's and 401Ks, not to a Roth IRA, because taxes have already been paid on that.

In some people's situation it is to their advantage to convert some or all of their 401K's or IRAs to a Roth before they turn 70.5, full or partial, but they have to be careful and do the numbers to make sure it works for them

You are right Sharon, this isn't sneaky. You are paying taxes on money you deferred

doc03

(35,340 posts)
5. What is sneaky about it I have known about it for years? An IRA is a tax defered
Mon Apr 3, 2017, 11:51 PM
Apr 2017

(retirement account) that is what it was meant for not an inheritance program. The RMD is very low
I started withdrawing from my IRA at 65. I started out at 4% a year and have increased it every year for inflation.
The RMD starts out at 3.56% at 70 1/2 even at 85 it is only 6.76%. If I have any complaints it would be the tax on
SS benefits that is a tax on a tax you paid.

Progressive dog

(6,904 posts)
6. Money intended for retirement is supposed to be used for
Tue Apr 4, 2017, 12:00 AM
Apr 2017

retirement. It's a nuisance, but financial advisors all know about it and will keep you informed of the minimum distribution required.

central scrutinizer

(11,650 posts)
7. I'm 66 and take distributions from my IRA each year
Tue Apr 4, 2017, 12:09 AM
Apr 2017

I estimate my income for the year, compare that to the amount where the marginal tax rate jumps from 15% to 25% and take the difference even if I don't need the cash. I want to leave as little untaxed money for my heirs to deal with as possible.

moonscape

(4,673 posts)
9. Pretty bad headline - using 'sneaky' for something well-known and open. The Treasury does
Tue Apr 4, 2017, 12:39 AM
Apr 2017

deserve to start getting some tax dollars on earned income at some point!

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,861 posts)
10. As others have already pointed out,
Tue Apr 4, 2017, 01:49 AM
Apr 2017

this isn't sneaky at all. Nor is it an obscure thing. If nothing else, the company holding your retirement fund should be letting you know about the mandatory disbursement of funds. And, to be honest, those most likely not to take disbursements, are likely to be wealthy enough to know about all of these things.

This is actually stupid click bait.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Watch out for this sneaky...