General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJosh Marshall: De-Derping the 'Un-Masking' Story
De-Derping the 'Un-Masking' Story
ByJosh Marshall
PublishedApril 3, 2017, 7:21 PM EDT
My read on Eli Lake's story about Susan Rice 'unmasking' Trump transition officials is that it's a rather elaborate attempt to make a scandal out of something that isn't scandalous at all. Given what we know just about Mike Flynn's activities in November and December of 2016 alone, Rice's alleged actions don't seem that surprising at all. National security experts seem to agree.
But here's something in the story that got my attention.
Read this paragraph, the third graf down in the story.
What jumps out to me here is the last sentence. Cohen-Watnick, whose new boss, National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster, was trying to fire him while all this was happening, took his 'research' to the White House Counsel's Office. They reviewed what he had come up with, did some additional research on Rice's requests and then "instructed him to end his own research."
This is all very cryptic and it's sort of a throwaway line in Lake's story. It's so spare you could read a number of possibilities into the sentence. Maybe the Counsel's office said, 'Wow, this is so big we need to take over this critical investigation you've started. Thank you so much for your work.' But that does not seem like the most likely read.
I would suggest that a much more plausible read is that Cohen-Watnick brought his 'research' to the Counsel's office, they looked at and basically said, 'Knock it off.'
That would make sense on a few fronts.
As even Lake concedes, Rice's alleged actions - if the report is accurate - were almost certainly legal. Most national security experts say they were not only legal but entirely proper. Moreover, the kind of snooping around that Cohen-Watnick was apparently doing could very plausibly be interpreted as an attempt to monitor or interfere with the on-going counter-intelligence probe of Trump associates' ties to Russia. The White House Counsel's job is to protect and look after the legal interests of the President. A good lawyer would likely want to shut that kind of freelancing down right away, especially if what Cohen-Watnick had found didn't amount to anything that helped the President or the White House.
more...
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/de-derping-the-un-masking-story
kentuck
(111,098 posts)Thanks Josh!
Orrex
(63,213 posts)Hugin
(33,148 posts)What a pathetic situation we find ourselves in... This is exactly why I gave up Karma.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)we'll get at least 3 or 4 investigations into this matter as well.
Orrex
(63,213 posts)Zoonart
(11,868 posts)I know you are but what am I? Blame Obama...rinse repeat.
kentuck
(111,098 posts)When he was Trump's National Security Adviser?
calimary
(81,283 posts)Hugin
(33,148 posts)Just like having an email server.
But, the Trumpanzees are desperate to turn this whole Trumplin treachery into a he-said-she-said case. Classic FUD operation.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Why aren't the people inside our government who are attempting a coup being held to task?
I guess the founding fathers couldn't envision the electorate being so desperate and hateful that they'd elect a mafia-like crime family?
underpants
(182,818 posts)Let's not forget that. I'm not proposing that that was a good thing.
You had to be an adult male who either owned land or were a merchant who was considered to be a pillar of the community. They specifically weeded out the riff raff.
NewRedDawn
(790 posts)This dead eyed fat bald blob was gutted live last week by David Corn on Lawrence O'Donnell. Another Bloomberg Trump toady like pinched faced Mark heartburn Halperin.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)"fat bald blob"
"pinched faced"
What do their appearances have to do with any facts or issues in this story?
NewRedDawn
(790 posts)I hate these motherfuckers that are destroying this country. I say it like it is. if you dont like it tough shit! My family is under attack by these mother fuckers & it is personal with me. They are trying to take insurance from my sick wife for one. So guess what Bernarado it goes way beyond politics to me!
Trouble is we been way civil with these fucking traitors way too long & what has it gotten us? I love Michelle Obama, but going high when they go low? Got us teabaggers & Trump. They deserve more than what little insults I can throw at them.So lay the fuck off!
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)From the DU Terms of Service (emphasis added):
Members are expected to respect diversity and demonstrate an appropriate level of sensitivity when discussing related topics. Racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, or other forms of bigoted intolerance are not permitted.
Why we have this rule: Democratic Underground is a diverse community which includes people of every race, sex, religious belief (or lack thereof), sexual orientation, gender identity, body type, disability, age, etc. We want to promote a welcoming atmosphere for all of our members, and do not want to provide a platform for bigotry.
NewRedDawn
(790 posts)year old thinning hair fat blob who hates with a passion these Fascist motherfuckers. Again, do you have someone you love that these vermin are trying to literally kill with their policies?
I will demean them & resist them with all my being. Political correctness be damned! Thank you for your concern.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)... unless it plays directly to an issue or policy or statement of theirs. I think you misunderstand the meaning and purpose of what sometimes gets derisively called "political correctness".
It's the same reason we here don't call people or actions we don't like "gay" the way rednecks do. The reason is contained in the excerpt from the terms of service I quoted. Please read it again not for the surface but for the deeper meaning. The reason is that when you body-shame somebody for their appearance you give many readers the uncomfortable impression that their own appearance is a negative.
The prohibition against body-shaming is not just against calling women "fat" or "wearing a James Brown wig".
"What's good for the goose is good for the gander."
NewRedDawn
(790 posts)Fuckers, Mother fuckers, Son of a bitches. Better now? LOl.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)Loubee
(165 posts)cannot be underped.